2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2an35857c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A universal immuno-PCR platform for comparative and ultrasensitive quantification of dual affinity-tagged proteins in complex matrices

Abstract: Protein detection in complex biological fluids and matrices has become a widely diversified field utilizing a number of different technologies. The quantification of target proteins in complex media such as serum remains a challenge for most technologies such as mass spectrometry, ELISA and western blot. Quantitative Immuno-PCR has been heavily used for antigen detection in immunoassays, but minimally so for quantifying affinity-tagged proteins expressed or circulating in complex matrices--despite its high sen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result confirms that the fluorescence‐based sensing approach by far exceeds the performance of the reflectance‐based sensor which gave a LOD in the order of 10 −8 m . Moreover, the fluorescence‐based pSiRM sensor outperforms the quantitative immuno‐PCR assay for SrtA in terms of LOD (10 −14 m vs 10 −12 m ) and analysis time (30 min vs 4 h including the PCR step), demonstrating its potential as a point‐of‐care diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result confirms that the fluorescence‐based sensing approach by far exceeds the performance of the reflectance‐based sensor which gave a LOD in the order of 10 −8 m . Moreover, the fluorescence‐based pSiRM sensor outperforms the quantitative immuno‐PCR assay for SrtA in terms of LOD (10 −14 m vs 10 −12 m ) and analysis time (30 min vs 4 h including the PCR step), demonstrating its potential as a point‐of‐care diagnostic tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The systematic analyses of individual Ter sites both in vitro and in vivo with respect to their affinity and kinetics for Tus, ability of forming a TT-lock structure as well as their position and orientation within the bacterial genome have provided a wealth of information as to how this seemingly simple protein-DNA interaction impedes replication forks. In fact, Tus-Ter has become one of the best-understood protein-DNA complexes, leading to the development of a variety of biotechnological applications (54)(55)(56)(57). Yet, we are only just starting to understand the modus operandi of Tus in vivo.…”
Section: A Simplified Type II Replication Fork Trap In E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be a trade-off between background and sensitivity when it comes to the number of wash steps performed in an immuno-PCR, as there is with ELISA. The number of washes in a TT-lock qIPCR has previously been optimised for different assay methods [40][41][42] and so formed the basis of washing protocols here. At 3 SD above the negative sample the positive cut-off value is 0.9 ∆Ct (mixture format).…”
Section: Patient Sera Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we report the development of two new quantitative immuno-PCR (qIPCR) assays building on the TT-lock qIPCR platform [40][41][42]. We have engineered two new detection devices for the sensitive detection of TM-specific antibodies: TM tagged with the haemagglutinin A epitope (TM-HA) and Tus-TM ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%