2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile multi-method ensemble for wind farm layout optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the sequential search strategies are characterized by a major drawback; the order of parameter entry (or deletion) affects the selected model [32]. To overcome this issue, the use of EA-based approaches [33], such as genetic algorithms (GAs) [34], the BDE algorithm [21], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [35], the coral reef optimization (CRO) algorithm [36], or a combination of these techniques, have been shown to be effective even if they are computationally more demanding. In practice, the main advantages of EAs are (i) their fast convergence to a near-global optimum, (ii) their superior global searching capability in complicated search spaces, and (iii) their applicability even when gradient information is not readily achievable.…”
Section: The Motivation For Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sequential search strategies are characterized by a major drawback; the order of parameter entry (or deletion) affects the selected model [32]. To overcome this issue, the use of EA-based approaches [33], such as genetic algorithms (GAs) [34], the BDE algorithm [21], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [35], the coral reef optimization (CRO) algorithm [36], or a combination of these techniques, have been shown to be effective even if they are computationally more demanding. In practice, the main advantages of EAs are (i) their fast convergence to a near-global optimum, (ii) their superior global searching capability in complicated search spaces, and (iii) their applicability even when gradient information is not readily achievable.…”
Section: The Motivation For Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a multi-method ensemble known as coral reef optimization with substrate layers (CRO-SL) was proposed [27][28][29] and successfully applied to very different optimization problems in science and engineering, such as energy grid and microgrid design [30][31][32], mechanical and structural design [33][34][35][36][37], and electrical engineering [38][39][40]. The CRO-SL is a low-level, evolutionary-based multi-method ensemble which combines different types of search operators within a single population (reef) by dividing it in different zones (substrates), in which a different operator is applied.…”
Section: Contribution and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wind characteristics considered for this challenge are specified in [55] and also described in [32]. Briefly, the wind distribution frequency and wind speed are the same for all wind-farm scenarios.…”
Section: Comparison In Benchmark Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its incredibly high computational cost, the authors of [30] have offered a novel method of building the wind farm optimally using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model software. The Coral Reefs Optimization algorithm with Substrate Layer (CRO-SL), which can combine various search algorithms in a single population, is employed in a fairly recent work [31], which proposes an ensemble strategy for tackling the WFLO issue. In [32], a multi-objective Elitist Teaching-Learning Based Optimization (ETLBO) algorithm is proposed for the WFLO problem where the objective is to produce maximum power while minimizing the cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%