2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(01)00859-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A vertical Hall device in CMOS high-voltage technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D I is the width of partial implantation strips and D P is the spacing between partial implantation strips. The implantation layout of N-well is divided into multiple implantation strips instead of making an opening over the entire N-well active area [7][8].…”
Section: Partial N-well Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…D I is the width of partial implantation strips and D P is the spacing between partial implantation strips. The implantation layout of N-well is divided into multiple implantation strips instead of making an opening over the entire N-well active area [7][8].…”
Section: Partial N-well Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCAD process and device simulations have been performed to validate the feasibility of the proposals. Fig.1 shows the typical structure of CMOS VHDs with five contacts [8]. The device active area is usually formed by a deep N-well on a p-type substrate with low-doped concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) pure CMOS technology (Hall sensor, reprinted from[85], with permission from Elsevier. ); (b) post-CMOS S&A process (thermal RMS converter[86]); (c) wafer-level stacking (cantilever array[87]); (d) flip-chip stacking (LETI's accelerometer[88]), and (e) SOP (Bosch's accelerometer[89])Table 5.2 Characteristics of different S&As with respect to their CMOS integration of literature describing CMOS fabrication and material sets…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 However, semiconductor-based magnetometers exhibit limited sensitivity for small magnetic fields in the range of Earth's magnetic field, exhibit large temperature dependency and offsets, and require complicated fabrication processes. [3][4][5] Despite high resolution ͑nT Ͻ 1͒, the flux-gate consumes significant power ͑hundreds of mW͒ during operation. In addition, the realization of very small search coil and micromachined flux-gate magnetometers is usually a challenge because of the difficulty in fabrication of miniaturized coils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%