“…Reactions carried out in the presence of RNase A, which contains eight redox reactive 144 cysteines capable of forming four disulfide bonds (Klink et al, 2000), at the same concentration 145 as the tetramer did not enhance the rate of copper reduction (Figure 2 -figure supplement 2F). 146 Similarly, 1 µM of DTT directly reduced an equimolar 2 µM of Cu 2+ but did not substantially 147 enhance the rate of cupric ion reduction by TCEP (Figure 2 -figure supplement 2F), emphasizing 148 the unique role of H3C110 in the structural context of the H3-H4 tetramer for enzymatic activity.149The pair of histidine residues at position 113 (H3H113) at the H3-H3' interface have also 150 been proposed to participate in metal coordination (Adamczyk et al, 2007; Saavedra, 1986). This 151 highly conserved residue is present in the canonical histone H3 of all 166 eukaryotes that span the 152 major kingdoms (Macadangdang et al, 2014), as well as in the structurally-equivalent position of 153 most (29 out of 33) archaeal histones spanning the major phyla (Henneman et al, 2018) (Figure 154 157 et al, 2015), had little effect on the rate of reduction with Cu 2+ -Tricine as the substrate (data not 158 shown) but diminished cupric ion reduction in reactions with Cu 2+ -ADA (Figure 2I and Figure 2 159 -figure supplement 2G) or Cu 2+ -NTA as Cu 2+ substrates (Figure 2 -figure supplement 2H and I).160The differing effects of ADA, NTA, and Tricine on copper reduction rates are likely due in part to 161 their differing Cu 2+ coordination ability and/or geometry.…”