Iron–sulfur clusters play
important roles in biology as
parts of electron-transfer chains and catalytic cofactors. Here, we
report a detailed computational analysis of a structural model of
the simplest natural iron–sulfur cluster of rubredoxin and
its cationic counterparts. Specifically, we investigated adiabatic
reduction energies, dissociation energies, and bonding properties
of the low-lying electronic states of the complexes [Fe(SCH3)4]2–/1–/2+/3+ using multireference
(CASSCF, MRCISD), and coupled cluster [CCSD(T)] methodologies. We
show that the nature of the Fe–S chemical bond and the magnitude
of the ionization potentials in the anionic and cationic [Fe(SCH3)4] complexes offer a physical rationale for the
relative stabilization, structure, and speciation of these complexes.
Anionic and cationic complexes present different types of chemical
bonds: prevalently ionic in [Fe(SCH3)4]2–/1– complexes and covalent in [Fe(SCH3)4]2+/3+ complexes. The ionic bonds result
in an energy gain for the transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2– → [Fe(SCH3)4]− (i.e., FeII → FeIII)
of 1.5 eV, while the covalent bonds result in an energy loss for the
transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2+ →
[Fe(SCH3)4]3+ of 16.6 eV, almost
half of the ionization potential of Fe2+. The ionic versus
covalent bond character influences the Fe–S bond strength and
length, that is, ionic Fe–S bonds are longer than covalent
ones by about 0.2 Å (for FeII) and 0.04 Å (for
FeII). Finally, the average Fe–S heterolytic bond
strength is 6.7 eV (FeII) and 14.6 eV (FeIII) at the RCCSD(T) level of theory.