1990
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/23/9/022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute total cross section for electron scattering on water in the energy range 25-300 eV

Abstract: Absolute total electron scattering cross sections for water molecules measured in the 25-300 eV incident energy range using a linear electron transmission device are presented. The results are compared with previous data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the lack of a monochromator, the energy resolution was 0.35 eV, hence not allowing discrimination of even vibrational excitation. In fact, their results 40 are slightly (4% at 25 eV) lower than those of Szmytkowski; 35 the difference 41 amounts to 15% at 4 eV. Nishimura and Yano 42 used a similar linear geometry but a short (2.5 mm) scattering cell, which straightforwardly leads to large angular resolution errors: their TCS at 10 eV is 20% lower than that of Szmytkowski.…”
Section: Total Scattering Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, due to the lack of a monochromator, the energy resolution was 0.35 eV, hence not allowing discrimination of even vibrational excitation. In fact, their results 40 are slightly (4% at 25 eV) lower than those of Szmytkowski; 35 the difference 41 amounts to 15% at 4 eV. Nishimura and Yano 42 used a similar linear geometry but a short (2.5 mm) scattering cell, which straightforwardly leads to large angular resolution errors: their TCS at 10 eV is 20% lower than that of Szmytkowski.…”
Section: Total Scattering Cross Sectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unfortunately, it was not possible to locate a complete set of all cross-sections from a single source covering the entire energy range required. Measured values of cross-sections tend to depend upon experimental conditions (Saglam & Aktekin, 1990). Using varied sources will therefore lead to some uncertainty when considering the ratio of two cross-sections (e.g.…”
Section: Electron Scattering Cross-sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the study of Ref. [20] found Solid symbols correspond to direct measurements, hollow symbols to measurements corrected for forward-angle elastic scattering: filled triangle present results, cyan filled circle [30], filled inverted triangle [15], open inverted triangle [13], filled square [16], darkred filled circle [31], times [32], filled rhombus [17]. (b) Total cross section comparison between present results filled triangle and theoretical predictions: dots SEP(CP)a1 [33], dotted dash SEP(ED) a1 [33]; integral elastic cross section dashed filled circle initial state J ¼ 0 [34], and dashed filled square thermal average [34]; dash additivity rule [35], dashed open circle semiempirical formula [35], dashed open square Schwinger approach [36], solid line R matrix [37], dashed plus IAM plus BEB [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%