1950
DOI: 10.1093/jee/43.2.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption and Metabolism of DDT by Resistant and Susceptible House Flies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1955
1955
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DDT absorption continued rapidly for about one hour after application and thereafter at a slow rate up to about 46% of total applied, after 4 hr. These results are in general agreement with those of Sternburg et al (1950) who found that their susceptible flies absorbed 10% of the applied DDT at "zero" time after application and 60% after 4 hr. The solvent used in their experiments was ethanol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DDT absorption continued rapidly for about one hour after application and thereafter at a slow rate up to about 46% of total applied, after 4 hr. These results are in general agreement with those of Sternburg et al (1950) who found that their susceptible flies absorbed 10% of the applied DDT at "zero" time after application and 60% after 4 hr. The solvent used in their experiments was ethanol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although the proportion absorbed after 4 hr was generally similar for each of the strains, very different quantities of DDT were initially applied (0.1, 1 and 10 ~tg/fly), thus the absolute rates of penetration differed strongly. Sternburg et al (1950) also found that the rate of DDT penetration into the fly was related to the amount of DDT on the outside of the body. The rate of absorption was greater at high concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DDT resistance was first characterized by Sternburg, Kearns, and Bruce (1950) and Perry and Hoskins (1951) as resulting from the accelerated rates of conversion by highly resistant houseflies of DDT to its nontoxic derivative DDE. While the various susceptible strains produced little or apparently no DDE from topically applied DDT, highly resistant strains converted over 50% of absorbed DDT to DDE.…”
Section: Biochemistry Of Ddt Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehydrochlorination is involved in the transformation of DDT to DDE (134,135) and of lindane to pentachlorocyclohexene (136). Reductive de chlorination is involved in the formation of DDD from DDT by yeast (137) and rats (134).…”
Section: Biotransformationmentioning
confidence: 99%