2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1633652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption loss at nanorough silver back reflector of thin-film silicon solar cells

Abstract: Absorption losses at a nanorough silver back reflector of a solar cell were measured with high accuracy by photothermal deflection spectroscopy. Roughness was characterized by atomic force microscopy. The observed increase of absorption, compared to the smooth silver, was explained by the surface plasmon absorption. Two series of silver back reflectors ͑one covered with thin ZnO layer͒ were investigated and their absorption related to surface morphology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
139
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
139
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has also been reported in other studies [11] and a similar increase in the absorption of rough silver layers respect to smooth ones has been measured by means of Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy (PDS) [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This fact has also been reported in other studies [11] and a similar increase in the absorption of rough silver layers respect to smooth ones has been measured by means of Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy (PDS) [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This substrate reduces texture mediated plasmon absorption [25][26][27] in the metallic back reflector and thus diminishes the optical losses, but thanks to the LP-CVD ZnO, it supplies a sufficient amount of roughness for light trapping in the absorber. Similarly, it has been reported in a pin solar cell 28 that the configuration with a smoothed metallic back reflector has optical advantages compared to rough back reflector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this simplification leads to an underestimation of the enhancement factor, especially since it also does not consider reduced light intensity by absorption losses in the rough ZnO / Ag back reflector 43,44 and doped silicon layers. Figure 13 shows the f values calculated from the data shown in Fig.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will underestimate the influence of absorption losses at the back reflector, since rough ZnO / Ag layers used in solar cells show higher parasitic absorptions. 43,44 In Table II quantum efficiencies at = 0.9 m and cell current densities in the spectral region of 650-1100 nm are given for front contact TACs of 0.5 and 1 wt %. Even though the calculation based on Eq.…”
Section: ͑3͒mentioning
confidence: 99%