Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer A
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2000.832193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction and constraint satisfaction techniques for planning bandwidth allocation

Abstract: Communication networks are expected to offer a wide range of services to an increasingly large number of users, with a diverse range of quality of service. This calls for efficient control and management of these networks. We address the problem of quality-of-service routing, more specifically the planning of bandwidth allocation to communication demands. Shortest path routing is the traditional technique applied to this problem. However, this can lead to poor network utilization and even congestion. We show h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key idea of blocking island (BI) [9] is transforming the original network graph into a hierarchy tree which contains available bandwidth information. The benefits of applying blocking island for path searching is obvious: it reduces the routing path search space significantly with bandwidth guarantee.…”
Section: ) Blocking Island Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key idea of blocking island (BI) [9] is transforming the original network graph into a hierarchy tree which contains available bandwidth information. The benefits of applying blocking island for path searching is obvious: it reduces the routing path search space significantly with bandwidth guarantee.…”
Section: ) Blocking Island Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forwarding rules are installed along the shortest paths between frequent pairs in advance. Blocking island paradigm [9] is also applied to CheetahFlow to make traffic adaptive routing for elephant flows. The advantage of this scheme is that most of the flows are forwarded in data plane without asking the controller to make decisions in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMCFP with capacity constraints is known to be NP-complete [6]. Attempts to solve IMCFPs can be found in [5,13,16].…”
Section: Related Problems and Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unsuccessful attempt means either the re-routed solution is rejected by the SA criteria, or re-routing fails because there is no possible path. 5 Re-route all demands. If local search could not restore consistency, it implies that it was trapped in a local optimum.…”
Section: Figure 3 Repair With Simulated Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A more complete description can be found in [12]. The approach gives a unique network decomposition (and hence hierarchy AH(R)) for any network state R (see [3] for a proof). As the bandwidth resources on the links change over time (due to allocations and deallocations of network traffic) controllers detect this and update their organisational relationships by merging and splitting their regions:…”
Section: Adaptive I/c -Hierarchy (Ah)mentioning
confidence: 99%