2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2014.6883793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CheetahFlow: Towards low latency software-defined network

Abstract: Software defined networking (SDN), which enables programmability, has the advantage of global visibility and high flexibility. However, when forwarding new flows in SDN, the interaction between the switch and the controller imposes extra latency such as round-trip time and routing path search time. Even though such latency is acceptable for elephant flows since it only takes limited ratio of total transmission time of elephant flows, it is an overkill to pay certain overheads for mice flows due to the their sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that the switch does not know how to forward packets by optimal routing path for the first time, until the controller discovers the links among switches and sends flow tables to the switches along the routing path, which introduces extra latency in this discovery and delivery process. Our results also coincide with the measurements in [27,29]. Meanwhile, the latency of packets with the traditional network framework is a little bit higher than that with the proposed network framework.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that the switch does not know how to forward packets by optimal routing path for the first time, until the controller discovers the links among switches and sends flow tables to the switches along the routing path, which introduces extra latency in this discovery and delivery process. Our results also coincide with the measurements in [27,29]. Meanwhile, the latency of packets with the traditional network framework is a little bit higher than that with the proposed network framework.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, there are plenty of strategies investigated to reduce the latency of SDN-enabled networks further, such as CheetahFlow [27], DIFANE [28], DevoFlow [29], and FlowShadow [30]. Mice flows account for a large portion of the total number of flows usually corresponding to the most important information in power grid, such as protection and control information.…”
Section: Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing a redundant architecture is one of the main challenging operations in a highly available SDN. Additionally, latency is another major issue facing the network providers. The latency does not only affect the traffic but also the failover times, and thus, this comes at the cost of HA.…”
Section: Dependability High Availability and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CheetahFlow [14] predicts various communication pairs via Support Vector Machine and reroutes them to the non-congestion path efficiently by applying blocking island paradigm. However, unlike our proposed solution, CheetahFlow mainly targets avoiding congestion along a fixed path.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%