2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design

Abstract: Finding new materials with targeted properties has traditionally been guided by intuition, and trial and error. With increasing chemical complexity, the combinatorial possibilities are too large for an Edisonian approach to be practical. Here we show how an adaptive design strategy, tightly coupled with experiments, can accelerate the discovery process by sequentially identifying the next experiments or calculations, to effectively navigate the complex search space. Our strategy uses inference and global optim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
457
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
457
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The ramifications of this observation deserve special emphasis: we suggest that ML models (and indeed, possibly other types of models in materials science) are more useful as guides for an iterative sequence of experiments, as opposed to single-shot screening tools that can reliably evaluate an entire search space once and shortlist high-performing materials. Laboratory discoveries reported in Xue et al 12 and Ren et al 31 reinforce the efficacy of such an iterative, data-driven approach.…”
Section: Materials Informatics (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ramifications of this observation deserve special emphasis: we suggest that ML models (and indeed, possibly other types of models in materials science) are more useful as guides for an iterative sequence of experiments, as opposed to single-shot screening tools that can reliably evaluate an entire search space once and shortlist high-performing materials. Laboratory discoveries reported in Xue et al 12 and Ren et al 31 reinforce the efficacy of such an iterative, data-driven approach.…”
Section: Materials Informatics (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Ideally, the result of training such models would be the experimental realization of new materials with promising properties. The MI community has produced several such success stories, including thermoelectric compounds, 10,11 shapememory alloys, 12 superalloys, 13 and 3d-printable high-strength aluminum alloys. 14 However, in many cases, a model is itself the output of a study, and the question becomes: to what extent could the model be used to drive materials discovery?…”
Section: Materials Informatics (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches have largely been data-driven with materials knowledge used to construct features. Although some of the recent adaptive strategies can potentially overcome certain shortcomings (6,29), a principled approach requires integrating prior information with available data within a Bayesian framework. Few attempts, if any, in the materials literature incorporate theory within a Bayesian formalism to constrain the model outcomes.…”
Section: Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using an example of perovskites, we show how this information can be utilized to discover empirical rules for materials design. Machine learning (ML) methods are becoming increasingly popular in accelerating the design of new materials by predicting material properties with accuracy close to ab initio calculations, but with computational speeds orders of magnitude faster [1][2][3]. The arbitrary size of crystal systems poses a challenge as they need to be represented as a fixed length vector in order to be compatible with most ML algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arbitrary size of crystal systems poses a challenge as they need to be represented as a fixed length vector in order to be compatible with most ML algorithms. This problem is usually resolved by manually constructing fixed length feature vectors using simple material properties [1,[3][4][5][6] or designing symmetry-invariant transformations of atom coordinates [7][8][9]. However, the former requires a case-by-case design for predicting different properties, and the latter makes it hard to interpret the models as a result of the complex transformations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%