2007
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v8i3.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to Communication for Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing and ESL Students in Blended Learning Courses

Abstract: In an effort to better understand student perceptions of communication in blended (online and traditional) learning courses, a 22 item questionnaire was developed and sent to all students registered for these courses at a large technology-focused college during three quarters of instruction. The respondents were divided into four groups: 1) hearing, 2) deaf, 3) hard-of-hearing (D/HH), and 3) English as a second language (ESL). Their perceptions of communication and the blended learning experience were examined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These features would also satisfy Universal Design for Learning requirements, as students with a variety of learning preferences could benefit (Rose et al, 2010). When designed with DHH learners in mind, online educational videos offer a preferential learning alternative for DHH students as compared with an in-person, mainstreamed setting with hearing learners (Long et al, 2007; Pappas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Access Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features would also satisfy Universal Design for Learning requirements, as students with a variety of learning preferences could benefit (Rose et al, 2010). When designed with DHH learners in mind, online educational videos offer a preferential learning alternative for DHH students as compared with an in-person, mainstreamed setting with hearing learners (Long et al, 2007; Pappas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Access Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, some of these differences have been found to result in an improved learning experience for the students in the course. For example, studies have found hybrid learning environments helpful for deaf and ESL students; Long, Vignare, Rappold and Mallory () found that “the online format slows the synchronous pace and allows the deaf, hard‐of‐hearing, and ESL students, more time to compose a response or ask a relevant question” (2). Well‐designed hybrid course environments that include a range of content resources (such as videos, readings, websites, podcasts, and other content delivery mechanisms) also help students to choose the form of learning that works best for them, to learn in a self‐paced format, and to learn more independently.…”
Section: Changing Roles Of Teachers and Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Οι ερευνητές μάλιστα κατέληξαν στο συμπέρασμα ότι η επίδραση της μειονεξίας στην ακαδημαϊκή εμπλοκή είναι πολύ μικρή, με την έννοια ότι αυτό που κάνει τους μη ακούοντες να μην επιδεικνύουν την απαιτούμενη αφοσίωση στις ακαδημαϊκές υποχρεώσεις και δραστηριότητες της συμβατικής εκπαίδευσης, δεν είναι η μειονεξία τους, αλλά το ότι δεν τους παρέχονται ίσες ευκαιρίες επικοινωνίας και συμμετοχής. Τις αντιλήψεις μη ακουόντων στην ΕαΑ μικτού τύπου (blended learning) μελέτησαν οι Long, Vignare, Rappold & Mallory (2007). Σύμφωνα με τα αποτελέσματα της έρευνάς τους, ανάμεσα σε ακούοντες, κωφούς, βαρήκοους και φοιτητές που είχαν την Αγγλική ως δεύτερη γλώσσα, οι μη ακούοντες (κωφοί και βαρήκοοι) έδειξαν με μεγαλύτερη συχνότητα θετική στάση απέναντι στη μικτού τύπου ΕαΑ.…”
Section: αξιοποίηση των νέων τεχνολογιών σε κωφούς/βαρήκοους εκπαιδευunclassified