2003
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hospital accreditation is therefore one component in the maintenance of patient safety. (Buetow SA & Willingham J., 2003).…”
Section: Hospital Accreditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospital accreditation is therefore one component in the maintenance of patient safety. (Buetow SA & Willingham J., 2003).…”
Section: Hospital Accreditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Practice-level or team accreditation is not a new concept to primary care in the UK, with previous initiatives such as Quality Team Development, Quality Practice Award, and practice team accreditation. 8,9 These previous schemes have all been voluntary programmes using standards set above the expected minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 These are quality control (mandatory, externally set, minimum predetermined acceptable standards), mandatory regulation (legal or safety standards), continuous quality improvement (to show ongoing excellence above a minimum standard), information giving (to enable comparison between providers by patients and policy makers), and marketing (to showcase a standard of service available). A complex picture emerges from reviews of healthcare accreditation schemes worldwide but two key features are commonplace -promoting change, and professional development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Buetow and Wellingham have suggested five ways in which accreditation may be used. 3 These are quality control (mandatory, externally set, minimum predetermined acceptable standards), mandatory regulation (legal or safety standards), continuous quality improvement (to demonstrate excellence above a minimum standard), information giving (to enable comparison between providers by patients and policy makers), and marketing (to showcase services available).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Accreditation in primary care settings is generally seen as a way of assessing and benchmarking the performance of general practice care across a broad range of clinical and organisational domains. 3 It describes a formal process of selfassessment and external and independent peer review to encourage best practice and can result in recommendations for continuous quality improvement of safety and quality. 4 Buetow and Wellingham have suggested five ways in which accreditation may be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%