Accuracy of aging ducks in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Waterfowl Parts Collection Survey

Abstract

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conducts an annual Waterfowl Parts Collection Survey to estimate composition of harvested waterfowl by species, sex, and age (i.e., juv or ad). The survey relies on interpretation of duck wings by a group of experienced biologists at annual meetings (hereafter, flyway wingbees). Our objectives were to estimate accuracy of age assignment at flyway wingbees and to explore how accuracy rates may influence bias of age composition estimates. We used banded mallards (Anas platyrhynchos; n = 791), wood ducks (Aix sponsa; n = 242), and blue‐winged teal (Anas discors; n = 39) harvested and donated by hunters as our source of birds used in accuracy assessments. We sent wings of donated birds to wingbees after the 2002–2003 and 2003–2004 hunting seasons and compared species, sex, and age determinations made at wingbees with our assessments based on internal and external examination of birds and corresponding banding records. Determinations of species and sex of mallards, wood ducks, and blue‐winged teal were accurate (>99%). Accuracy of aging adult mallards increased with harvest date, whereas accuracy of aging juvenile male wood ducks and juvenile blue‐winged teal decreased with harvest date. Accuracy rates were highest (96% and 95%) for adult and juvenile mallards, moderate for adult and juvenile wood ducks (92% and 92%), and lowest for adult and juvenile blue‐winged teal (84% and 82%). We used these estimates to calculate bias for all possible age compositions (0–100% proportion juv) and determined the range of age compositions estimated with acceptable levels of bias. Comparing these ranges with age compositions estimated from Parts Collection Surveys conducted from 1961 to 2008 revealed that mallard and wood duck age compositions were estimated with insignificant levels of bias in all national surveys. However, 69% of age compositions for blue‐winged teal were estimated with an unacceptable level of bias. The low preliminary accuracy rates of aging blue‐winged teal based on our limited sample suggest a more extensive accuracy assessment study may be considered for interpreting age compositions of this species. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA

Duckling survival of mallards in Southland, New Zealand

“…Upon capture, we attached an NZ Department of Conservation metal leg band with a unique number to the left leg of each female. We determined age as second year (SY) or after second year (ASY) primarily by bursa depth (Hanson ), and then by inspecting the greater secondary coverts (Krapu et al ) and 4 distal primary coverts (Carney and Geis , Hopper and Funk , Pearse et al ). We weighed birds with a spring scale (±10 g; Pesola, Schindellegi, Switzerland).…”

Integrated population models facilitate ecological understanding and improved management decisions

“…Using mallards from midcontinent North America as an example, waterfowl researchers have access to long‐term data on sightability‐adjusted counts of breeding pairs and flooded ponds beginning in 1955 (USFWS ), banding and recovery data since 1950 (Anderson ), and measures of species, sex, and age composition from the harvest since the 1960s (Gendron and Smith , Raftovich et al ). These operational surveys were explicitly designed to inform harvest management decisions (Nichols et al ) and have undergone periodic assessments and improvements (Anderson , Smith , Padding and Royle , Pearse et al ).…”

Increased rice flooding during winter explains the recent increase in the Pacific Flyway White‐fronted GooseAnser albifrons frontalispopulation in North America

“…Fish and Wildlife Service maintains the Parts Collection Survey (PCS), in which randomly selected US hunters send by mail duck wings and goose tails for identification and determination of sex (ducks only) and age‐class (Pearse et al . 2014, Raftovich et al . 2018).…”