2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.655986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate in-line CD metrology for nanometer semiconductor manufacturing

Abstract: The need for absolute accuracy is increasing as semiconductor-manufacturing technologies advance to sub-65nm nodes, since device sizes are reducing to sub-50nm but offsets ranging from 5nm to 20nm are often encountered. While TEM is well-recognized as the most accurate CD metrology, direct comparison between the TEM data and in-line CD data might be misleading sometimes due to different statistical sampling and interferences from sidewall roughness. In this work we explore the capability of CD-AFM as an accura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3-right. The AFM was shown in [6] to be well correlated to TEM and CD SEM on gate resist and gate poly CD with R 2 > 98%.…”
Section: Afm Scanning and Probe Technologymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3-right. The AFM was shown in [6] to be well correlated to TEM and CD SEM on gate resist and gate poly CD with R 2 > 98%.…”
Section: Afm Scanning and Probe Technologymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Table 1 summarizes the short-term precision and accuracy. AFM is shown to be well correlated to TEM and CD SEM on gate resist and gate poly CD with R 2 > 98% [6]. Figure 1 shows a long-term stability trend for the linewidth measurement.…”
Section: Afm Capability: Past and Presentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Since many semiconductor structures have CD variances of several nm along their length, trying to infer average device geometry from a single cross-section introduces additional measurement error and uncertainty. CD-AFM enables the metrologist to take multiple cross-sections along a user defined length of the sample, thereby allowing the metrologist to eliminate LER / LWR effects on measured CD [3] and quantify LER / LWR [2], while greatly reducing the time and expense intrinsic to cross-sectioning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%