2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18082682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Measurements of Wall Shear Stress on a Plate with Elliptic Leading Edge

Abstract: A micro-floating element wall shear stress sensor with backside connections has been developed for accurate measurements of wall shear stress under the turbulent boundary layer. The micro-sensor was designed and fabricated on a 10.16 cm SOI (Silicon on Insulator) wafer by MEMS (Micro-Electro-Mechanical System) processing technology. Then, it was calibrated by a wind tunnel setup over a range of 0 Pa to 65 Pa. The measurements of wall shear stress on a smooth plate were carried out in a 0.6 m × 0.6 m transonic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By now, plenty of research has proved that wall shear stress (WSS) measurement along the leading edge is a realistic way to detect the separation line/point in real-time. Basically, WSS measurement can be divided into two major schemes: hot-wire/film based shear-stress sensor [108,109] and floating-element based sensor [110][111][112]. The structure of Hotwire/film sensors is relatively simple, employing heated components on the sensor surface to indirectly measure the variation of shear stress, with fast response (around dozens of kilohertz) and high sensitivity (<1 Pa) [108,109].…”
Section: Flexible Shearing Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By now, plenty of research has proved that wall shear stress (WSS) measurement along the leading edge is a realistic way to detect the separation line/point in real-time. Basically, WSS measurement can be divided into two major schemes: hot-wire/film based shear-stress sensor [108,109] and floating-element based sensor [110][111][112]. The structure of Hotwire/film sensors is relatively simple, employing heated components on the sensor surface to indirectly measure the variation of shear stress, with fast response (around dozens of kilohertz) and high sensitivity (<1 Pa) [108,109].…”
Section: Flexible Shearing Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oppositely, floating-element based sensors directly sense the shear-stress force with the floating element. Most of the floating element structures apply moving components for shear stress measurement [110][111][112].…”
Section: Flexible Shearing Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly important when the flow state transitions from laminar to turbulent, or when the flow is fully turbulent. This is because the magnitude of wall shear stress in the turbulent boundary layer is larger than that in the laminar boundary layer [89]. However, these devices typically measure wall shear stress in order of Pascals, which is insufficient for most aerodynamic applications where the wall shear stress can be of the order of tens of Pascal or even much more when the flow speed is increased [88].…”
Section: Metallic-based Calorimetric Mems Thermal Flow Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floating elements [ 31 ] provide an average measurement of the skin friction over a certain area, but clearly not the distribution of the skin-friction field. Localized skin-friction data can be obtained via micro-floating element sensors based on Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) [ 27 , 32 ], via hot films [ 33 , 34 ] and via wall hot wires [ 35 ], but these single, surface-based sensing elements have to be arranged in arrays to obtain a skin-friction distribution, which still has limited spatial resolution. Moreover, the required complexity of the arrays increases for the determination of the direction of the skin-friction vector, and the application of all these surface-mounted sensors in high Reynolds number flows is particularly difficult because of their relatively large size compared to the small thickness of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%