1988
DOI: 10.1525/si.1988.11.2.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aces and Bombers: The Post‐Exam Impression Management Strategies of Students

Abstract: In this study we attempted to develop a classification of the strategies students employ to manage self‐impressions after grades have been awarded and examination papers returned. These encounters between students are of three types: first, when students who have scored a top grade in this exam (Aces) encounter other students who received a low or even failing grade (Bombers); second, when Aces encounter other Aces; and, third, when Bombers encounter other Bombers. The impression management strategies employed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For data analysis, we had a systemic approach, including initial, focused and axial coding processes. In the last step of coding, we also performed cross-checks that allowed us to refine and confirm the appropriateness of the identified themes (Albas and Albas, 1988; Charmaz, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data analysis, we had a systemic approach, including initial, focused and axial coding processes. In the last step of coding, we also performed cross-checks that allowed us to refine and confirm the appropriateness of the identified themes (Albas and Albas, 1988; Charmaz, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some students practice selective disclosure of their competence, demonstrating their full academic ability before supportive peers but concealing it when dealing with peers who would be more critical (Albas and Albas 1988; Fordham and Ogbu 1986; Horvat and Lewis 2003). As Shoenberger, Heckert, and Heckert (2012) noted in their study of gifted students, “Although these students are successful in the classroom and receive praise for their achievements from parents and professors, they also acknowledge that negative reactions influence their decisions to hide their high achieving behavior [from their peers]” (p. 782).…”
Section: Feigning Incompetencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aces often go so far as to provide accounts for their own “lucky” outcomes. Incidentally, such an Ace is the same person who in a group composed of only Aces was heard to remark that the exam was “a piece of cake.” (Albas and Albas 1988:298)…”
Section: Feigning Incompetencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, some interactionists have directly contributed to the study of the educational process. Among the most noteworthy of these studies are Becker, Hughes, Geer, and Strauss (1961); Becker, Geer, Reisman, and Weiss (1968); Hargreaves, Hestor, and Melor (1975); Albas and Albas (1984, 1988, 1994); Evans (1987, 1988, 1994); Evans and Falk (1986); and Haas and Shaffir (1987). Also instructive are the works of Bernstein (1972), Martin (1975), Fine (1985), Dingwall (1987), Adler and Adler (1991, 1994), Dietz (1994), Emerson (1994), Campbell (2003), and Karp, Holmstrom, and Gray (2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%