2004
DOI: 10.1145/1027084.1027089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving high encoding efficiency with partial dynamic LFSR reseeding

Abstract: Previous forms of LFSR reseeding have been static (i.e., test application is stopped while each seed is loaded) and have required full reseeding (i.e., the length of the seed is equal to the length of the LFSR). A new form of LFSR reseeding is described here that is dynamic (i.e., the seed is incrementally modified while test application proceeds) and allows partial reseeding (i.e. length of the seed is less than that of the LFSR). In addition to providing better encoding efficiency, partial dynamic LFSR resee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These shortcomings are tackled by linear compression methods. The most widely adopted linear compression method is the reseeding of linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) [16]- [18]. LFSR reseeding exploits the low fill rate of test cubes.…”
Section: T He Main Objective Of Test Data Compression (Tdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shortcomings are tackled by linear compression methods. The most widely adopted linear compression method is the reseeding of linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) [16]- [18]. LFSR reseeding exploits the low fill rate of test cubes.…”
Section: T He Main Objective Of Test Data Compression (Tdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exemplary decompressor architecture used here is based on partial seeding, which injects a fixed amount of free variables into the LFSR in each shift cycle [19,20]. Figure 4 depicts the decompressor structure with two free variables fed into it in each cycle.…”
Section: A Partial Seedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fully specified scan-in states of functional broadside tests are not compatible with the most popular test data compression methods [Barnhart et al 2001;Chandra et al 2011;Koenemann 1991;Krishna et al 2004;Lin and Rajski 2012;Pomeranz 2016;Rajski et al 2002;Sun et al 2004;Tenentes et al 2008]. These methods compress tests into initial states (seeds) for a linear-feedback shift register (LFSR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%