2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
1,041
1
25

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,786 publications
(1,084 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
17
1,041
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological treatment using sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) and chemical treatment using lime and limestone are usually employed for heavily contaminated mine water. Ion exchange and membrane methods are too expensive for the treatment of heavily contaminated mine water and pretreatment is generally required to avoid fouling of membranes and resins (Adriano et al, 1980;Bosman, 1983;Conlon, 1990;Johnson and Hallberg, 2005;Maree et al, 1989;Hlabela et al, 2007;Hammack et al, 2006). Due to the high costs associated with chemical treatment technologies and long residence time requirement for biological treatment, there has been a concerted effort towards developing a cost effective alternative technology for treatment of mine water .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological treatment using sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) and chemical treatment using lime and limestone are usually employed for heavily contaminated mine water. Ion exchange and membrane methods are too expensive for the treatment of heavily contaminated mine water and pretreatment is generally required to avoid fouling of membranes and resins (Adriano et al, 1980;Bosman, 1983;Conlon, 1990;Johnson and Hallberg, 2005;Maree et al, 1989;Hlabela et al, 2007;Hammack et al, 2006). Due to the high costs associated with chemical treatment technologies and long residence time requirement for biological treatment, there has been a concerted effort towards developing a cost effective alternative technology for treatment of mine water .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the occurrence of acid mine waters -acid mine drainage (AMD), which adversely affect the ecosystem. Therefore, various methods have been developed 92 for the treatment of the acidic, metal-rich mine waters. One of these methods is the biological remediation of acidic mine waters.…”
Section: Application Of Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans In Treatment Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AMD transport in the near-surface is complicated by attenuation mechanisms, including reactions of sorption, complexation, precipitation-dissolution, oxidation-reduction, and biological uptake (Gandy et al, 2007). In particular, wetlands have been identified as settings that host many AMD attenuating reactions due to their steep redox and dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration gradients (Johnson & Hallberg, 2005). Wetlands with clay deposits can also host sorption reactions as positively charged metals adsorb to negatively charged clay particles or organic material (Sheoran & Sheoran, 2006).…”
Section: Reactive Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetlands have the capacity to precipitate metal sulfides (Sheoran & Sheoran, 2006) and adsorb positive metal ions to negatively charged clay particles or organic material (Johnson & Hallberg, 2005). The longer flow paths and slower velocities of subsurface flow allow for greater contact time with biogeochemically active attenuating features, therefore flow through the subsurface can be particularly important to promoting removal processes (Gandy et al, 2007;Mulholland & DeAngelis, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%