2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic imaging using under-determined inverse approaches: Frequency limitations and optimal regularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with prior strategy, the posterior strategy does not require the prior knowledge of the noise variance in advance. The generalized cross validation (GCV) method [25] and the L-curve method [26,27] as the posterior strategy are the two most widely used methods for selecting the optimal regularization parameters, both of which have good adaptability in the engineering application. Although the convergence of the GCV criterion has been proven theoretically, the GCV function curve sometimes is too flat, which makes it difficult to determine the minimum value of the GCV function.…”
Section: Shock and Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with prior strategy, the posterior strategy does not require the prior knowledge of the noise variance in advance. The generalized cross validation (GCV) method [25] and the L-curve method [26,27] as the posterior strategy are the two most widely used methods for selecting the optimal regularization parameters, both of which have good adaptability in the engineering application. Although the convergence of the GCV criterion has been proven theoretically, the GCV function curve sometimes is too flat, which makes it difficult to determine the minimum value of the GCV function.…”
Section: Shock and Vibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the minimization problem without regularization is ill-conditioned [13][14][15], meaning that the solution can be very sensitive to measurement noise or model uncertainties, therefore a discrete smoothing norm is used to regularize the unknown solution q λβ . We can define the discrete smoothing norm as…”
Section: Inverse Problem Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to ill-conditioned matrix with multiple inverse solutions. The matrix inverse is based on the singular value decomposition method (SVD) and variety of regularisation methods such as truncated SVD and Tikhonov regularisation technique in conjunction with the methods optimising the choice of regularisation parameter 9,12,13 . In this paper the direct method based on the Kirchhoff integral discretisation is employed to reconstruct the elevation profile of a static, rigid rough surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assume that q z in equation (8) is approximately constant for all the receivers with the value given by the direction specular to that of the source, q s z (x m ) = 2kz s /R s . The resulting ill-conditioned matrix can be regularised with the help of Tikhonov regularization technique 13 and the surface elevation at point x m can be approximated with…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation