Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re ected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication.
Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. In this paper, the collocation XIBEM formulation is described and numerical results given. The numerical results are compared against closed-form or converged solutions. Comparisons are made against the conventional boundary element method and the non-enriched isogeometric BEM (IGABEM).When compared to non-enriched boundary element simulations, using XIBEM significantly reduces the number of degrees of freedom required to obtain a solution of a given error; thus, with a fixed computational resource, problems of a shorter wavelength can be solved.