2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustically evoked potentials in two cephalopods inferred using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
1
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
46
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent laboratory experiments have demonstrated that squid do not exhibit anti-predator responses in the presence of odontocete echolocation clicks (Wilson et al 2007) indicating that they cannot detect the ultrasonic pressure component of a sound field. However, recently, Hu et al (2009) suggested that squid (Sepiotheutis lessoniana) can detect sound pressure stimuli using their statocyst organ. Unfortunately, these data had several methodological issues including no calibrations of particle motion and placing squid at the water's surface where discrepancies between sound pressure and particle motion are greatest.…”
Section: The Sensitivity Of Squid To Acoustic Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent laboratory experiments have demonstrated that squid do not exhibit anti-predator responses in the presence of odontocete echolocation clicks (Wilson et al 2007) indicating that they cannot detect the ultrasonic pressure component of a sound field. However, recently, Hu et al (2009) suggested that squid (Sepiotheutis lessoniana) can detect sound pressure stimuli using their statocyst organ. Unfortunately, these data had several methodological issues including no calibrations of particle motion and placing squid at the water's surface where discrepancies between sound pressure and particle motion are greatest.…”
Section: The Sensitivity Of Squid To Acoustic Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have shown the squid statocysts to be key sensory organs that may detect acceleration and can transduce detection of sound stimuli (Budelmann, 1990;Packard et al, 1990;Hu et al, 2009;Mooney et al, 2010). These studies combined with the findings presented here make it attractive to suggest squid hair cells as an invertebrate model system to study hair cell physiology and pharmacology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, those studies examined lateral line hair cells, which were bath-exposed to neomycin, as opposed to the encapsulated vestibular system hair cells analyzed in our study, making comparisons with our treatment protocol difficult. Lower concentrations of neomycin treatment (0.8 mmol l Ϫ1 ) do appear to impact statocyst physiological responses in the oval squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana, extinguishing acoustically evoked potentials between 20 and 30 min after methodologically similar injections into the statocyst (Hu et al, 2009). However, Hu et al did not examine morphological changes, and they suggest that the extinction of response may have been due to brain death as opposed to hair cell damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cephalopods exhibit a high degree of cephalization and a complex neural system with very efficient sensory organs such as lens eyes, chemo-receptors and balance receptors. 1,2 It is believed that these vertebrate-like features arose from the competition with fish since their first occurrence during the so called "Cambrian explosion" around 500 million years ago. 3,4 Although many features of fish and cephalopods have been described as convergent, fundamental anatomical and physiological differences of cephalopods constrain their evolutionary competition with fish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%