1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00423254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition and loss of behaviorally augmented tolerance to ethanol in the rat

Abstract: The phenomenon of behavioral augmentation of tolerance (BAT) to ethanol (EtOH) in the rat was replicated in studies using the moving belt test of intoxication. Rats performing the test daily under the influence of EtOH (2.2 or 2.5 g/kg i.p.) developed tolerance more rapidly than those receiving the same dose after each daily session on the belt. However, both groups reached the same maximum level of tolerance. Acceleration of tolerance by BAT was proportional to the frequency of performance under the influence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though chronic (daily) drug administration is not essential for tolerance to occur, it is significant that shifts in the doseeffect curves did not occur during the ascending series. Although pharmacological accounts of tolerance do not appear applicable to the present findings (see e.g., LeBlanc, Kalant, Gibbins, & Berman, 1969), there are a number of studies indicating that tolerance-like plienomena can emerge by enivironmental or nonpharmacological manipulations (e.g., LeBlanc & Cappell, 1977;Schuster, Dockens, k Woods, 1966;Siegel, 1975; see review by Corfield-Sumner & Stolerman, 1978). Both the shifts to the right in the dose-effect curve and the increased effects obtained with ethanol upon re-exposure to the lower FR values would appear to be more directly attributable to residual but enduring effects produced by the behavioral experience and drug effects under the higher-valued FR schedules.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Though chronic (daily) drug administration is not essential for tolerance to occur, it is significant that shifts in the doseeffect curves did not occur during the ascending series. Although pharmacological accounts of tolerance do not appear applicable to the present findings (see e.g., LeBlanc, Kalant, Gibbins, & Berman, 1969), there are a number of studies indicating that tolerance-like plienomena can emerge by enivironmental or nonpharmacological manipulations (e.g., LeBlanc & Cappell, 1977;Schuster, Dockens, k Woods, 1966;Siegel, 1975; see review by Corfield-Sumner & Stolerman, 1978). Both the shifts to the right in the dose-effect curve and the increased effects obtained with ethanol upon re-exposure to the lower FR values would appear to be more directly attributable to residual but enduring effects produced by the behavioral experience and drug effects under the higher-valued FR schedules.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Furthering the notion that NAC Homer2b overexpression elicits a behavioral phenotype similar to that produced by repeated alcohol experience (eg Crabbe et al, 1981Crabbe et al, , 1982Kalant et al, 1978;LeBlanc et al, 1969;Phillips et al, 1991;Tabakoff and Culp, 1984;Tabakoff et al, 1980), tolerance developed to alcohol's motor-impairing effects following the repeated administration of a moderate dose of alcohol only in mice overexpressing Homer2b (Figure 4). While increases and decreases, respectively in NAC Homer2b overexpression appear to be sufficient to promote and prevent tolerance to alcohol's motor-impairing effects (Szumlinski et al, 2005b;Figure 4), recent evidence implicates both mGluR1 and NMDA receptors in regulating alcohol-induced sedation and motor sensitization (eg Kotlinska et al, 2006;Lominac et al, 2006).…”
Section: Accumbens Homer2b Upregulation Promotes Alcohol Rewardmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…If drug taking does not resume, homeostatic mechanisms will gradually readapt to the absence of the drug (LeBlanc et al 1969) and tolerance will be diminished or lost. We now know that detoxification is, at best, a first step in treatment and that simply achieving a drug-free state is not the most significant accomplishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%