Across Siberia and over Europe: Phylogenetic relationships of the freshwater fish genus Rhodeus in Europe and the phylogenetic position of R. sericeus from the River Amur

Bohlen, Jörg; Šlechtová, Vendula; Bogutskaya, Nina G.; Freyhof, Jörg

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.020

Cited by 65 publications

(107 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fossil records of leuciscine cyprinids in the EMZS date back to the late Oligocene (Frickinger, 1991), and this first invasion was also supported by molecular data (Zardoya & Doadrio, 1999). One species of bitterling (Rhodeus) (Bohlen et al, 2006b) is thought to have invaded the EMZS during the Pliocene. The oldest known cobitid fossil, Cobitis centrochir Agassiz, was dated to the Middle Miocene (15 MYA) of Germany (Frickinger, 1991).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…However, there was already a connection between the Anatolian landmass and Central Asia during the early Oligocene (34-32 MYA) (Popov et al, 2004). While many authors have studied the biogeography of freshwater fishes within Europe (Durand et al, 1999;Zardoya & Doadrio, 1999;Perdices & Doadrio, 2001;Durand et al, 2003;Perdices et al, 2003;Ketmaier et al, 2004;Bohlen et al, 2006a;Perdices et al, 2008), there are only a few studies referring to the relationship between European and Asian freshwater fishes (Bǎnǎrescu, 1989(Bǎnǎrescu, , 1992Zardoya & Doadrio, 1999;Perdices & Doadrio, 2001;Kohlmann et al, 2003;Bohlen et al, 2006b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multiple invasions of Europe by East Asian cobitid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitidae)

et al. 2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While it has been widely suggested that freshwater fishes from East Asia invaded the western Palaearctic, details about this process are largely unknown. Here, using the cytochrome b gene, we evaluated the phylogenetic relationships of a small group of Eurasian primary freshwater fishes (Cobitidae), which are widely distributed and species rich in East Asia and Europe, with the purpose of inferring their invasion process of Europe from East Asia. Though phylogenetic relationships of cobitids were not well resolved, our analysis could identify three sister groups formed by the European and East Asian cobitids, which brought new insights into the biogeography of the genera Cobitis, Misgurnus, and Sabanejewia. The present results support the view that Asian cobitid fishes may have invaded Europe at least five times independently, and once reverse colonization of European cobitids to East Asia could also be found. Ancestral Sabanejewia might have been the first cobitids to cross Siberia and invade the EMZS (Euro-Mediterranean zoogeographic subregion) about 33.54 million years ago (MYA). One lineage of Cobitis and the ancestor of Misgurnus fossilis (Linnaeus) almost in the same time invaded the Europe, responding to 16.71 MYA and 16.59 MYA, respectively. Three different lineages of Cobitis were found to have invaded the EMZS from East Asia, and once reverse invasion to East Asia occurred to one subclade of European Cobitis. And our data also suggest that the diversity of East Asian cobitid fishes, especially of the genus Cobitis, is greatly underestimated.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple invasions of Europe by East Asian cobitid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitidae)

et al. 2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Rhodeus amarus is the only bitterling species in Europe, where its distribution is natural and where it has been present for at least 2 Myr [22][23][24]. All other bitterling species are restricted to East Asia where they are abundant [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two distinct phylogeographic clades colonized much of continental Europe independently, each originating from the same refugium. A Danubian clade colonized central and western Europe via the Danube basin, whereas a Baltic clade colonized eastern and northern Europe via the Rivers Dnieper, Dniester and Bug [22,23]. Populations of R. amarus are generalists and use all native European unionid mussel species for oviposition but display preference for Unio tumidus, Unio pictorum and Anodonta anatina over Anodonta cygnea [15,17,27].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Population-specific responses to an invasive species

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predicting the impacts of non-native species remains a challenge. As populations of a species are genetically and phenotypically variable, the impact of non-native species on local taxa could crucially depend on populationspecific traits and adaptations of both native and non-native species. Bitterling fishes are brood parasites of unionid mussels and unionid mussels produce larvae that parasitize fishes. We used common garden experiments to measure three key elements in the bitterling-mussel association among two populations of an invasive mussel (Anodonta woodiana) and four populations of European bitterling (Rhodeus amarus). The impact of the invasive mussel varied between geographically distinct R. amarus lineages and between local populations within lineages. The capacity of parasitic larvae of the invasive mussel to exploit R. amarus was higher in a Danubian than in a Baltic R. amarus lineage and in allopatric than in sympatric R. amarus populations. Maladaptive oviposition by R. amarus into A. woodiana varied among populations, with significant population-specific consequences for R. amarus recruitment. We suggest that variation in coevolutionary states may predispose different populations to divergent responses. Given that coevolutionary relationships are ubiquitous, population-specific attributes of invasive and native populations may play a critical role in the outcome of invasion. We argue for a shift from a species-centred to population-centred perspective of the impacts of invasions.

show abstract

“…fish species mussel initial glochidia load (median, range) figure 2), whereas the development success of native A. anatina showed an apparent coevolutionary signal in host suitability (Kruskal -Wallis: H 4,44 ¼ 32.3, p , 0.001, figure 2), with low success in species of east Asian origin (present in Europe for several decades) [17] and R. amarus (itself of east Asian origin and descent, with its ancestor colonizing southern Europe 2-3 Ma [18], and most of continental Europe during the Holocene [8,9]). Notably, very low development success under experimental conditions indicated that R. amarus is a non-functional host of A. anatina.…”

Section: Results and Discussion (A) Impact Of Anodonta Woodiana On Rhmentioning

confidence: 99%

An invasive species reverses the roles in a host–parasite relationship between bitterling fish and unionid mussels

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impact of multiple invading species can be magnified owing to mutual facilitation—termed ‘invasional meltdown’—but invasive species can also be adversely affected by their interactions with other invaders. Using a unique reciprocal host–parasite relationship between a bitterling fish ( Rhodeus amarus ) and unionid mussels, we show that an invasive mussel reverses the roles in the relationship. Bitterling lay their eggs into mussel gills, and mussel larvae parasitize fish. Bitterling recently colonized Europe and parasitize all sympatric European mussels, but are unable to use a recently invasive mussel, Anodonta woodiana . The parasitic larvae of A. woodiana successfully develop on R. amarus , whereas larvae of European mussels are rejected by bitterling. This demonstrates that invading species may temporarily benefit from a coevolutionary lag by exploiting evolutionarily naive hosts, but the resulting relaxed selection may facilitate its exploitation by subsequent invading species, leading to unexpected consequences for established interspecific relationships.

show abstract

Across Siberia and over Europe: Phylogenetic relationships of the freshwater fish genus Rhodeus in Europe and the phylogenetic position of R. sericeus from the River Amur

Cited by 65 publications

References 17 publications

Multiple invasions of Europe by East Asian cobitid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitidae)

Multiple invasions of Europe by East Asian cobitid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitidae)

Population-specific responses to an invasive species

An invasive species reverses the roles in a host–parasite relationship between bitterling fish and unionid mussels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About