2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity and characterization of a pH-sensitive antimicrobial peptide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of bacteria in the positive control wells shows that there was no change in impact due to pH. Similar effects from pH changes on cationic peptide activity have been reported by other researchers [ 23 , 24 ]. Surprisingly, TS activity was substantially greater at pH 6.0 than pH 8.0, which shows that the antimicrobial activity of TS was a little higher under acidic conditions than basic conditions, although it maintained good antibacterial activity under a wide range of pH levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The growth of bacteria in the positive control wells shows that there was no change in impact due to pH. Similar effects from pH changes on cationic peptide activity have been reported by other researchers [ 23 , 24 ]. Surprisingly, TS activity was substantially greater at pH 6.0 than pH 8.0, which shows that the antimicrobial activity of TS was a little higher under acidic conditions than basic conditions, although it maintained good antibacterial activity under a wide range of pH levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is consistent with previous reports that demonstrate cationic charge and net charge are important determinants of antimicrobial activity in AMPs. [ 41,54,60,61 ] These changes, however, do not appear to be driven by increased ability to permeabilize vesicles or native membranes. While increasing the net charge did result in moderate enhancements to lipid binding, this enhancement was not dependent on bilayer charge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the REES and TCE assays report on different aspects of Trp behavior (mobility and accessibility, respectively), the differences are potentially rooted in structural or aggregation state changes in the peptide in solution. [ 17,18,54 ] The CD spectra in Figure 6 indicate these three peptides (L1, L1‐Q, L1‐K) are not helical when in solution alone. However, the amino acid substitutions to change the net charge of the peptide are all at position 4, while the native Trp is at position 6 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inactivation of the histidine-containing AMP C18G-His under low pH conditions involves pH-dependent changes in the state of the aggregates in the solution, because the aggregates, which are sensitive to pH and lipid composition, may be affected by binding and conformation. Peptides can also enhance bacterial membrane permeability at low pH ( Hitchner et al, 2019 ). Thrombin-derived C-terminal peptides (TCPs) will also change the mode of CD14 (a protein that is abundant in human plasma) from anti-inflammatory mode to bacterial elimination mode from pH 7.4 to pH 5.5 ( Holdbrook et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Environmental Factors Affecting the Activity Of Antimicrobiamentioning
confidence: 99%