2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2010.5583013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity gesture spotting using a threshold model based on Adaptive Boosting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When 3-axis accelerometers are distributed over an individual’s body then each sensor can provide information about the orientation and movement of the corresponding body part. Researchers commonly use these inertial measurement units to recognize ambulatory movements (e.g., walking, running, sitting, climbing, and falling) [40], [41], posture [42] and gestures [43], [44], [45], [46]. …”
Section: Algorithms and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When 3-axis accelerometers are distributed over an individual’s body then each sensor can provide information about the orientation and movement of the corresponding body part. Researchers commonly use these inertial measurement units to recognize ambulatory movements (e.g., walking, running, sitting, climbing, and falling) [40], [41], posture [42] and gestures [43], [44], [45], [46]. …”
Section: Algorithms and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the instability of HMM probabilities, [17] uses similarity to known examples as a preprocessing filter, [19] uses boosting to improve threshold models, and [1] proposes online threshold adaptation. Outside of HMMs, other proposed spotting approaches have been based on dynamic time warping [26] and string matching [32].…”
Section: Gesture Spottingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the problem of activity recognition itself (Blanke and Schiele, 2010; Calatroni, Roggen and Tröster, 2011; Chieu, Lee and Kaelbling, 2006; Hachiya, Sugiyama and Ueda, 2012; Krishnan, Lade and Panchanathan, 2010; Kurz, Hölzl, Ferscha, Calatroni, Roggen and Tröster, 2011; Roggen, Frster, Calatroni and Trster, 2011; Venkatesan, Krishnan and Panchanathan, 2010; Zhao, Chen, Liu and Liu, 2010; Zhao, Chen, Liu, Shen and Liu, 2011), and the second is the problem of user localization, which can then be used to increase the accuracy of the activity recognition algorithm (Pan, Tsang, Kwok and Yang, 2011; Pan, Kwok, Yang and Pan, 2007; Pan, Shen, Yang and Kwok, 2008; Pan, Zheng, Yang and Hu, 2008; Zheng, Pan, Yang and Pan, 2008). Both problems present interesting challenges for transfer learning.…”
Section: Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers focus specifically on transferring across time differences (Krishnan et al, 2010; Pan et al, 2011; Pan et al, 2007; Venkatesan et al, 2010), differences between people (Chattopadhyay, Krishnan and Panchanathan, 2011; Hachiya et al, 2012; Rashidi and Cook, 2009; Zhao et al, 2011), and differences between devices (Zhao et al, 2010; Zheng et al, 2008). …”
Section: Physical Setting Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%