2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity of topical antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant bacteria recovered from burn patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
52
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported in the literatures that the MIC of mafenide HCl against these bacteria is above 1,024 lg/ml [38], which is similar to the MIC of eluted mafenide from Lap/Maf samples ( Table 4). The area of inhibited zone showed that Lap/Maf gel extract generated comparable inhibitory zone to mafenide solution as control, which were in accordance with those reported in other studies [38,39]. The negative control (Laponite without mafenide) did not demonstrate any bactericidal effect, demonstrating that the materials alone without antibiotic do not have any antimicrobial properties.…”
Section: Anti-microbial Efficacysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It has been reported in the literatures that the MIC of mafenide HCl against these bacteria is above 1,024 lg/ml [38], which is similar to the MIC of eluted mafenide from Lap/Maf samples ( Table 4). The area of inhibited zone showed that Lap/Maf gel extract generated comparable inhibitory zone to mafenide solution as control, which were in accordance with those reported in other studies [38,39]. The negative control (Laponite without mafenide) did not demonstrate any bactericidal effect, demonstrating that the materials alone without antibiotic do not have any antimicrobial properties.…”
Section: Anti-microbial Efficacysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These microorganisms have come into prominence as a cause of sepsis in many burn units. [11] Antibiotics should not be used for prophylaxis in burn, because it is well known that prophylactic antibiotic usage leads to colonization of resistant strains. [12] In cases where sepsis is strongly suspected, the initial antibiotic regimen to be delivered until the laboratory results are obtained should cover these organisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same film then rapidly released NO when exposed to short pulses of visible light. In addition, when a PUX-NO film was placed on top of an agar plate containing the Griess reagent and incubated at 37 C for 16 h in the dark, no pink coloration (due to formation of azo dye) was observed. PUX-NO films thus exhibit no thermal release of NO at physiological temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plates were then incubated as described above. The ''suspension assay'' was performed by diluting 100 lL of the E. coli working stock with 900 lL of TSB and incubating this culture at 37 C until an A 600 of 0.7 was reached. 50 lL of this solution was added to 100 mL of 0.8% (w/v) agar with 1% NaCl, which had been autoclaved and cooled to 47 C before the addition of the culture.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Effects Of Pux-no Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%