1996
DOI: 10.1080/01688639608408999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actual versus Self-reported Cognitive Dysfunction in HIV-1 Infection: Memory-Metamemory Dissociations

Abstract: The relationship between subjective awareness and objective neuropsychological status in HIV-1 infection remains unclear. Forty-six HIV-1 seropositive males were administered a battery of neuropsychological measures assessing episodic memory, metacognition, and depression. Results of ANOVA revealed a dissociation between subjects' self-complaint of neuropsychological impairment and objective performance, with subjects who denied cognitive impairment performing worse on memory testing. Three subgroups were iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that self-reported difficulties of cognitive inefficiency should not be interpreted in isolation (BeasonHazen et al, 1994;Hinkin et al, 1996;Mapou et al, 1993;Rourke et al, 1999aRourke et al, , 1999b. Gauging the individual's level of accuracy (e.g., based on subjective0objective discrepancy) may be a more fruitful approach than relying exclusively on subjective complaints (Rourke et al, 1999a(Rourke et al, , 1999b.…”
Section: Subjective Neurocognitive Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that self-reported difficulties of cognitive inefficiency should not be interpreted in isolation (BeasonHazen et al, 1994;Hinkin et al, 1996;Mapou et al, 1993;Rourke et al, 1999aRourke et al, , 1999b. Gauging the individual's level of accuracy (e.g., based on subjective0objective discrepancy) may be a more fruitful approach than relying exclusively on subjective complaints (Rourke et al, 1999a(Rourke et al, , 1999b.…”
Section: Subjective Neurocognitive Complaintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, individuals with HIV-1 infection may be classified as neuropsychologically "normal" or as having "subsyndromic" or mild neuropsychological impairment (Grant et al, 1999). The "Atypical" subtype was deemed to be analogous to an "over-reporters" subgroup (individuals whose subjective complaints are elevated in the context of normal neuropsychological test performance) reported in memory-metamemory research (Hinkin et al, 1996;Rourke et al, 1999a). The "Frontal-striatal" descriptor was chosen to reflect more extensive involvement of systems connecting frontal and subcortical regions of the brain (Cummings 1993a;Delis et al, 1995).…”
Section: External Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Each cognitive test was converted to an age-, sex-, and education-standardized Z-score using normative mean values and SD. Normative data for the computerized tests were provided by Cogstate from Europe, United States of America, South East Asia, and Australia/New Zealand, frequencymatched for age (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50), and 51+ years; minimum cell size n = 145), sex (157 female, 377 male), and education (university/further education, n = 243, or secondary school, n = 291). The normative population excluded individuals with clinical or functional impediments to test performance, and subsets of these data had been used previously to measure cognitive function in HIV+ adults.…”
Section: Cognitive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of these studies suggest that there may be multiple sources of variance contributing to neuropsychological symptoms in HIV infection. Moreover, subgroups of individuals who are HIV positive may vary in the accuracy of their self-reported cognitive complaints (Hinkin et al, 1996;Rourke et al, 1999b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%