1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90114-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effects of cocaine on cochlear function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study carried out by Perez, Kós e Frota (2006) 25 29 women (G2): higher auditory thresholds for frequencies of 250, 500, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz and the absence of TOAEs. The agreement of these results with the studies with guinea pigs exposed to cocaine 11,17 infers that crack and cocaine may be potentially ototoxic to the cochlea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the study carried out by Perez, Kós e Frota (2006) 25 29 women (G2): higher auditory thresholds for frequencies of 250, 500, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz and the absence of TOAEs. The agreement of these results with the studies with guinea pigs exposed to cocaine 11,17 infers that crack and cocaine may be potentially ototoxic to the cochlea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These results might be related to the kind of drug that was used, once studies on rats show that cocaine causes decreased blood flow in the cochlea and, with this sensitive structure to hypoxia, the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion were susceptible to degenerative damages 11,17,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[19][20][21][22] Similar to MDMA, cocaine blocks the reuptake of dopamine and serotonin at the presynaptic membranes. 23 A few cases of temporary severe sensorineural hearing loss after the use of cocaine or a combination of drugs are described in the literature. [24][25][26] Finally, smoking combined with noise exposure is hypothesized to correlate with hearing thresholds and NIHL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%