2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000080493.04978.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute etomidate treatment reduces cognitive deficits and histopathology in rats with traumatic brain injury

Abstract: Administration of etomidate both before and after injury attenuates secondary injury resulting from traumatic brain injury, but the effect is more pronounced with pretreatment. The ineffectiveness of postinjury etomidate on motor and histologic tasks suggests a brief therapeutic treatment window in rats. However, the treatment window in humans is unknown. Lastly, postinjury etomidate did not exacerbate neurologic or histologic outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impactor tip was leveled with the surface of the brain, and the injury was administered (impact speed: 4 m/sec, injury depth: 2.6 mm, dwell time: 50 msec). The injury settings were consistent with previous studies and designed to generate a brain injury with reproducible motor and cognitive deficits, as well as underlying cortical and hippocampal tissue loss (Dixon et al, 1991(Dixon et al, , 2003. Following injury the anesthesia was stopped, the incision was closed with interrupted silk sutures, and the animals were ventilated on 100% oxygen until spontaneous return of respiration, at which point the endotracheal tube was removed.…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impactor tip was leveled with the surface of the brain, and the injury was administered (impact speed: 4 m/sec, injury depth: 2.6 mm, dwell time: 50 msec). The injury settings were consistent with previous studies and designed to generate a brain injury with reproducible motor and cognitive deficits, as well as underlying cortical and hippocampal tissue loss (Dixon et al, 1991(Dixon et al, , 2003. Following injury the anesthesia was stopped, the incision was closed with interrupted silk sutures, and the animals were ventilated on 100% oxygen until spontaneous return of respiration, at which point the endotracheal tube was removed.…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Neuronal counting in the selectively vulnerable CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus underlying the area of the contusion was also performed using coronal sections 3.5 mm posterior to the bregma (Dixon et al, 1999b(Dixon et al, , 2003. The pyramidal cell layer from CA1 to the dentate gyrus of each hippocampus was sequentially imaged using a 10Âobjective (Nikon), digitally reconstructed into a montage (ImageJ), and the CA1 and CA3 subfields were identified.…”
Section: Tissue Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, there are numerous rodent models of acute and chronic degenerative diseases in the young and mature brain, in which standardized and sensitive behavioral outcome measures have been successfully correlated with regional neuropathology due in large part, to an extensive literature in rodent behavioral neuroscience (Almli 2000,Bona 1997,Dixon 2003,Young 1986). Research in swine behavior is historically limited to veterinary science communities, with a focus on neuro-development rather than neuropathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have reported a treatment-related improvement in learning and/or memory after experimental TBI in conjunction with CA3 neuronal survival (Sanderson et al, 1999, Leoni et al, 2000, Kline et al, 2001, Philips et al, 2001, Floyd et al, 2002, Kline et al, 2002, Ozdemir et al, 2005, Statler et al, 2006. However, other reports have clearly documented learning deficits in brain-injured animals in the absence of discernable hippocampal damage (Lyeth et al, 1990) or the converse, an improvement in MWM performance after injury without CA3 neuroprotection (Dixon et al, 2003, Hoover et al, 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%