1984
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-65-10-1845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Borna Disease Virus to the Mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is remarkable that in the upper region of the gels two components, most likely of cellular origin, bind to gamma globulins from normal rat and rabbit serum, but have no affinity for mouse serum, although mice are susceptible to BD virus infection without becoming clinically ill (Kao et al, 1984). This lack of non-specific adsorption of cellular material by mouse Ig was also found when a monoclonal antibody was used for the preparation of an immunoaffinity column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is remarkable that in the upper region of the gels two components, most likely of cellular origin, bind to gamma globulins from normal rat and rabbit serum, but have no affinity for mouse serum, although mice are susceptible to BD virus infection without becoming clinically ill (Kao et al, 1984). This lack of non-specific adsorption of cellular material by mouse Ig was also found when a monoclonal antibody was used for the preparation of an immunoaffinity column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…These findings in BH rats resemble those found in neonatally inoculated LEW rats and in infection of mice. The failure for the development of the disease in neonatally infected rats has been demonstrated to be due to immunological immaturity (Narayan et al, 1983b), whereas the clinically inapparent course of infection in mice (Kao et al, 1984) as well as that of BH rats cannot be explained on this basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical manifestations depend upon the host species and the virus strain used for infection. Mice and hamsters were found to be resistant to disease, despite high levels of virus persisting in the brain of the infected animals (Anzil et al, 1973;Kao et al, 1984). Lewis (LEW) rats are highly susceptible to disease, and lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) are caused by a virus-induced T cell-mediated immunopathological reaction (Narayan et al, 1983a, b) in which CD4 ÷ cells play a major role (Richtet al, 1989(Richtet al, , 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both animal strain-and age-specific host contributions to BD outcomes have also been reported in mice. For example, rodent-adapted BDV variants, but not rabbit-adapted variants or horse isolates, are able to replicate in mice (28), and a mouse-adapted BDV variant causes encephalitis and mild behavioral disease (i.e., hyperactivity) in adult MRL/ϩ mice but not in SJL mice (43). Infection of neonatal MRL mice with a rat-adapted BDV variant produces significant neurological disease linked to cytotoxic-T-cell-mediated immune responses restricted to H-2 k of major histocompatibility complex class I (20,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%