“…The specific purpose of the AC&P Working Group and this scan was not to evaluate, test, generalize, quantify, or validate any hypotheses, approaches, or interventions, but rather to identify, curate, analyze, and share examples of practices, challenges, and lessons learned related to how CTSA hubs have used their expertise, resources, and collaborations to advance clinical and translational research during emergency. Data sources included: scientific publications and white papers on CTSAs' (and other) AC&P-related activities; a diverse sample of CTSA hubs' websites: public stories, news, highlights, measures; NCATS and other clinical and translational science organizations' websites; select CTSA hub Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPRs) de-identified information; and feedback of CTSA expert/ community reviewers and other stakeholders [10]. Local adaptive capacity for disaster preparedness was considered through the lens of five core domains of the Local Adaptive Capacity (LAC) framework [10,11]: asset base (key assets that allow hubs to respond to evolving circumstances); institutions and entitlements (an appropriate and evolving institutional environment that allows fair access to key assets and capitals); knowledge, information, learning (the ability to collect, analyze, and disseminate knowledge and information to learn in support of adaptation activities); innovation (an enabling environment to foster innovation, experimentation, and the ability to explore pragmatic solutions and opportunities); and flexible forward-looking decision-making and governance (the ability to anticipate and respond to changes with regards to its decision-making, governance and operational structures).…”