Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041) 1997
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1997.609699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive critic based neurocontroller for autolanding of aircrafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important part of an autopilot is the control of an aircraft's longitudinal dynamics, and the most puzzling work of longitudinal autopilot is the automatic landing task. Many control researchers have developed several methodologies to achieve auto-landing flight control design, including PID (Ebrahimi and Coleman, 2001; Ha and Kim, 2005;Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998), LQR (Kim, et al, 2005), intelligent control (Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998), neural networks (Izadi, et al, 2003;Jorgenson and Schley, 1990;Juang and Cheng, 2001;Saini and Balakrishnan, 1997), fuzzy logic (Nho and Agarwal, 2000), and H∞ synthesis (Kaminer and Khargonekar, 1990;Li, et al, 2004;Niewoehner and Kaminer, 1996;Ochi and Kanai, 1999;Shue and Agarwal, 1999). Some of the designs of auto-landing used classical control techniques; these are the stability augmentation of the inner loop and the path tracking of the outer loop (Kaminer and Khargonekar, 1990;Jorgenson and Schley, 1990;Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important part of an autopilot is the control of an aircraft's longitudinal dynamics, and the most puzzling work of longitudinal autopilot is the automatic landing task. Many control researchers have developed several methodologies to achieve auto-landing flight control design, including PID (Ebrahimi and Coleman, 2001; Ha and Kim, 2005;Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998), LQR (Kim, et al, 2005), intelligent control (Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998), neural networks (Izadi, et al, 2003;Jorgenson and Schley, 1990;Juang and Cheng, 2001;Saini and Balakrishnan, 1997), fuzzy logic (Nho and Agarwal, 2000), and H∞ synthesis (Kaminer and Khargonekar, 1990;Li, et al, 2004;Niewoehner and Kaminer, 1996;Ochi and Kanai, 1999;Shue and Agarwal, 1999). Some of the designs of auto-landing used classical control techniques; these are the stability augmentation of the inner loop and the path tracking of the outer loop (Kaminer and Khargonekar, 1990;Jorgenson and Schley, 1990;Iiguni and Akiyoshi, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study we have used this methodology to solve linear and even nonlinear problems [1] [2][13] [14], some other people have also contributed to this research area [ll]. Although these papers have shown impressive results, so far there is no analysis on the mechanics of the method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the nonlinear model highly nonlinear modeling errors and unknown parameter errors still exist. In order to deal with the uncertainties, various adaptive control theories are introduced: neural network, parameter adaptation, fuzzy logic, and genetic algorithm [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Saini et al compared adaptive critic based neural networks with the PID controller in the aircraft landing [11].…”
Section: Et Al Constructed a Linear Fractional Model Whichmentioning
confidence: 99%