2018
DOI: 10.3390/robotics7010011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Image Thresholding of Yellow Peppers for a Harvesting Robot

Abstract: Abstract:The presented work is part of the H2020 project SWEEPER with the overall goal to develop a sweet pepper harvesting robot for use in greenhouses. As part of the solution, visual servoing is used to direct the manipulator towards the fruit. This requires accurate and stable fruit detection based on video images. To segment an image into background and foreground, thresholding techniques are commonly used. The varying illumination conditions in the unstructured greenhouse environment often cause shadows … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research achieved the lowest F-score (65) with the method of [11] for red and green pepper plants, while oranges obtained the highest F-score (96.4) with that of [24]. Previous reported results (Table 1) revealed a 91.5 and 92.6 F-score for peppers in [19,34], respectively, versus our method, which resulted in an F-score of 99.43. For apple images, our method obtained similar F-score performances as in previous work (~93), even though the dataset was much smaller (64 vs. 9 images).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research achieved the lowest F-score (65) with the method of [11] for red and green pepper plants, while oranges obtained the highest F-score (96.4) with that of [24]. Previous reported results (Table 1) revealed a 91.5 and 92.6 F-score for peppers in [19,34], respectively, versus our method, which resulted in an F-score of 99.43. For apple images, our method obtained similar F-score performances as in previous work (~93), even though the dataset was much smaller (64 vs. 9 images).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As can be seen in the table, most algorithms focus on pixel-based detection (e.g., segmentation). This is indeed a common method in fruit detection (e.g., [31,32,33,34]). Many segmentation algorithms have been developed [35] including: K-means [36], mean shift analysis [37], Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) [38], Support Vector Machines (SVM) [39], deep learning [25], and several others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the segmentation quality shows how well the area of the detected object matches to the manually labeled object. We used two measures to estimate the segmentation quality: segmentation-overlap and segmentation-efficiency (see Figure 3) [39,40]. Segmentation-overlap is defined as the ratio between the overlapped region ( O ) and the manually labeled region ( L ), where overlap is the common area between the segmented region ( S ) and the manually labeled region ( L ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a project supported by the National Technology Research and Development Program of China, proposed a custom designed tool and a lifting support for tomatoes harvesting [17]. Other studies focuses on vision-based algorithms for fruit targeting, as showed in recent works by the Department of Computing Science of Umeå University, which aims to automate the harvest of sweet pepper in greenhouses proposing RGB vision servo control [18], or by Washington State University, which focuses on depth camera-based techniques for robotic cherry harvesting [19]. In general, the design of agricultural mobile robots for grasping activities is considered the most challenging because of the complexity of the mechatronic system [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%