2017
DOI: 10.1177/0954410016687142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive mesh refinement method based investigation of the interaction between shock wave, boundary layer, and tip vortex in a transonic compressor

Abstract: Shock wave and tip leakage are important flow features at small length scales. These flow phenomena and their interactions play important roles in the performance of modern transonic fans and compressors. In most numerical predictions of these features, mesh convergence studies are conducted using overall performance data as criteria. However, less effort is made in assessing the quality of the predicted small-scale features using a mesh that yields a fairly accurate overall performance. In this work, this pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Vivarelli et al [73] proposed both a Hessian-based and an adjoint-based anisotropic mesh adaptation procedure for the NASA rotor 37, to then consider a mesh adaptation strategy based on adjoint quantities only, and considering the total pressure ratio, total temperature ratio, and adiabatic efficiency (Vivarelli et al [74] ). Finally, a methodology to adapt a mesh accounting for shocks and vorticity is presented in Gou et al [31] for the rotor 37 configuration specifically targeting the interactions between shock waves, boundary layers and tip leakage flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Vivarelli et al [73] proposed both a Hessian-based and an adjoint-based anisotropic mesh adaptation procedure for the NASA rotor 37, to then consider a mesh adaptation strategy based on adjoint quantities only, and considering the total pressure ratio, total temperature ratio, and adiabatic efficiency (Vivarelli et al [74] ). Finally, a methodology to adapt a mesh accounting for shocks and vorticity is presented in Gou et al [31] for the rotor 37 configuration specifically targeting the interactions between shock waves, boundary layers and tip leakage flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is necessary to refine the mesh to the peculiarities of the physical solution of the problem (for example, in the areas of discontinuities, rapid parameter changes), then dynamically adaptive meshes are used. Dynamically adaptive mesh, depending on the method of its construction, can be adaptively embedded or adaptively movable [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMR enables the simulated mesh to adapt both in space and time, assigning high spatial resolution to the areas in which the solution varies rapidly, and coarsening the mesh in regions of mild variations. This makes AMR particularly useful in capturing sharp fronts or shock formation [5,19]. By limiting the fine mesh resolution to regions in which it is required, AMR-based simulations significantly reduce computational complexity and accordingly enhance computational performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%