2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2015.7403212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive output-feedback fault-tolerant tracking control for mobile robots under partial loss of actuator effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantages of the proposed method compared to the previous works can be summarized as follows: (1) it is able to detect, isolate, and identify actuator faults, while in Skoundrianos and Tzafestas, 6 Pratama et al, 9 Halder and Sarkar, 10 Stavrou et al, 12 and Baghernezhad and Khorasani, 13 one can only detect and/or isolate fault; (2) it only requires Cartersian coordinate of the mobile robot, while in all of the previous papers except Chang et al, 16 all the states of the robot are needed for fault detection, isolation, and identification; (3) the proposed FTC approach is simple and easy to implement without a need to reconfigure/modify the nominal controller, while in Chang et al, 16 it is required to reconfigure the nominal controller; and (4) it is experimentally implemented and validated, while the proposed FTC approaches [14][15][16][17][18] are only verified by simulation without providing the results related to their real-time implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantages of the proposed method compared to the previous works can be summarized as follows: (1) it is able to detect, isolate, and identify actuator faults, while in Skoundrianos and Tzafestas, 6 Pratama et al, 9 Halder and Sarkar, 10 Stavrou et al, 12 and Baghernezhad and Khorasani, 13 one can only detect and/or isolate fault; (2) it only requires Cartersian coordinate of the mobile robot, while in all of the previous papers except Chang et al, 16 all the states of the robot are needed for fault detection, isolation, and identification; (3) the proposed FTC approach is simple and easy to implement without a need to reconfigure/modify the nominal controller, while in Chang et al, 16 it is required to reconfigure the nominal controller; and (4) it is experimentally implemented and validated, while the proposed FTC approaches [14][15][16][17][18] are only verified by simulation without providing the results related to their real-time implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-tuning fuzzy proportional–derivative (PD) controller is proposed in Srebro 15 to improve a control strategy for a WMR in the presence of fault. In Chang et al, 16 an actuator fault-tolerant controller is designed to accommodate partial loss of actuator effectiveness fault and a fault hiding approach is proposed in Stancu et al 17 to design an actuator FTC for a differential-drive mobile robot. In Olfa et al, 18 a fault-tolerant controller is designed to estimate a power-cut actuator fault using an adaptive observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%