2015
DOI: 10.1002/hep.27685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive remodeling of the biliary architecture underlies liver homeostasis

Abstract: Serving as the center for metabolism and detoxification, the liver is inherently susceptible to a wide variety of damage imposed by toxins or chemicals. Induction of cell populations with biliary epithelial phenotypes, which include progenitor-like cells and are referred to as liver progenitor cells, is often observed in histopathological examination of various liver diseases in both human patients and animal models and has been implicated in regeneration. However, the tissue dynamics underlying this phenomeno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
135
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(57 reference statements)
7
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S10). Our results confirm earlier data showing that in response to different injuries the plasticity of the biliary tree is remodelled accordingly2021, and suggest that the use of IFX and DEX may have an unprecedented impact on the flexibility of this hepatobiliary system. Contrarily to CDE, in DDC settings the remodeling of the biliary architecture was obvious and was therefore not quantified.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…S10). Our results confirm earlier data showing that in response to different injuries the plasticity of the biliary tree is remodelled accordingly2021, and suggest that the use of IFX and DEX may have an unprecedented impact on the flexibility of this hepatobiliary system. Contrarily to CDE, in DDC settings the remodeling of the biliary architecture was obvious and was therefore not quantified.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One possible function for oval cells could be restoration of the bile canaliculi network and liver polarity. Supporting these lines, inking the ductal tree has allowed visualization of its structure in different models of liver injury with oval cell expansion (Kaneko et al, 2015). Such studies show that oval cells are extensions of the pre-existing ductal tree, further challenging the view that oval cells are progenitor cells that seed the parenchyma to generate new hepatocytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biliary epithelial cells (also called cholangiocytes) are the innermost epithelial cells forming the conduit of this 3D network. Various means to visualize the 3D structure of the biliary network have been developed (Kaneko et al, 2015;Sparks et al, 2010). However, there is as yet no method to quantify differences in 3D branching patterns of the entire network, and this has presented a significant barrier to our understanding of the formation of the intrahepatic biliary network and the pathogenesis of liver diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammals, the apical membranes of two adjacent hepatocytes generate the bile canaliculus, which secretes bile into the intrahepatic biliary network; however, in zebrafish the bile canaliculi are unicellular structures and tubular invaginations of the hepatocyte apical membranes (Lorent et al, 2004;Sakaguchi et al, 2008). In zebrafish, the intrahepatic biliary network is formed by small-diameter ductular biliary epithelial cells, which might be analogous to small-diameter ductular biliary epithelial cells in the mammalian liver lobule that transport bile from the canalicular network to the intralobular bile ducts in the portral tract (Kaneko et al, 2015). Indeed, there is remarkable conservation of both genes and gene function across vertebrate biliary system development, and thus many candidate genes responsible for biliary system abnormalities in humans can be screened efficiently and rapidly in the zebrafish model Delous et al, 2012;Hand et al, 2009;Lorent et al, 2015Lorent et al, , 2010Lorent et al, , 2004Matthews et al, 2011Matthews et al, , 2005Sakaguchi et al, 2008;Schaub et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%