2017
DOI: 10.5849/jof.16-039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change: A National Experiment in Manager-Scientist Partnerships to Apply an Adaptation Framework

Abstract: Forest managers in the United States must respond to the need for climate-adaptive strategies in the face of observed and projected climatic changes. However, there is a lack of on-the-ground forest adaptation research to indicate what adaptation measures or tactics might be effective in preparing forest ecosystems to deal with climate change. Natural resource managers in many areas are also challenged by scant locally or regionally relevant information on climate projections and potential impacts. The Adaptiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches reflect notions that nowadays silviculture and forest management should account not only for ecological, economic and social issues, but also promote forest resilience to climate change, while maintaining the whole forestry value chain. For instance, in North America, a number of adaptation frameworks, built upon on science-management partnerships, have currently been implemented on-the-ground by the Canadian and US forest agencies to identify optimum combination of already-existent measures to prepare forests to climate change (e.g., Halofsky et al 2016;Nagel et al 2017); for a review, see Halofsky et al (2018). In Europe, Climate Smart Forestry, a similar concept to the Climate-Smart Agriculture concept developed by FAO, has been suggested to safeguard the mitigation potential of forests against climate change through an array of regionally tailored measures (Nabuurs et al 2017).…”
Section: A Variety Of Approaches For a Variety Of Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches reflect notions that nowadays silviculture and forest management should account not only for ecological, economic and social issues, but also promote forest resilience to climate change, while maintaining the whole forestry value chain. For instance, in North America, a number of adaptation frameworks, built upon on science-management partnerships, have currently been implemented on-the-ground by the Canadian and US forest agencies to identify optimum combination of already-existent measures to prepare forests to climate change (e.g., Halofsky et al 2016;Nagel et al 2017); for a review, see Halofsky et al (2018). In Europe, Climate Smart Forestry, a similar concept to the Climate-Smart Agriculture concept developed by FAO, has been suggested to safeguard the mitigation potential of forests against climate change through an array of regionally tailored measures (Nabuurs et al 2017).…”
Section: A Variety Of Approaches For a Variety Of Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and of silviculture for adaptation (Nagel et al. ). Some interesting advances in ecological genetics (e.g., Nadeau et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive capacity -which covers a wide range of ecological, physiological, and genetic phenomena that dictate a species' ability to persist under changing environmental conditions-is currently the greatest uncertainty in vulnerability assessments (Chmura et al 2011, Hof et al 2011, Aubin et al 2016). Its inclusion is necessary to increase the accuracy of our vulnerability assessment, but also for the development of comprehensive adaptation strategies (Webster et al 2017) that incorporate the concepts of evolutionary resilience (Sgr o et al 2011) and of silviculture for adaptation (Nagel et al 2017). Some interesting advances in ecological genetics (e.g., Nadeau et al 2015b, Gallien et al 2016) and in functional ecology (e.g., Violle et al 2012, Sides et al 2014) and even more interestingly the intersection of these fields (e.g., Franks et al 2014, Prieto et al 2017) may provide the backbone of a way forward capturing adaptive capacity.…”
Section: Limitations and The Way Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can inform the structure of landscape-scale treatments designed to efficiently sustain ecosystem services. An excellent example is the Adaptive Silviculture for Climate Change (ASCC; www.forestadaptation.org/ascc) program, which is testing alternative forest treatment tactics, including assisted migration (Nagel et al 2017). Many adaptive management studies are motivated by long-term climate projections, whereas relatively few take advantage of short-or near-term ecoclimatological forecasts that will become increasingly reliable and accessible in the future.…”
Section: J Anticipatory Science To Inform Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%