“Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing”, 2nd Edition

Edgar, Jonathan; Tint, Saxon

doi:10.1595/205651315x688406

Cited by 153 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the development of technology and the improvement of people's living standards, consumer demand for personalized and diversified products becomes more and more prominent. Three‐dimensional printing (3DP) technology, as one of the most representative technologies in the third industrial revolution, is ushering in a huge opportunity for development, owing to the characteristics of manufacturing personalized products . Compared with traditional processing technology, 3D printing has many advantages such as low cost, easy operation, and short processing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of processing parameters in fused deposition modeling based on mechanical properties of acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene filament

Huang

Meng

et al. 2018

Polymer Engineering & Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Four processing parameters, layer thickness, printing speed, raster angle, and building orientation were investigated in terms of their effects on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of acrylonitrilebutadiene-styrene (ABS) samples in fused deposition modeling (FDM) by orthogonal experiments. The results show that both the building orientation and the printing layer thickness have a great influence on the mechanical properties of ABS specimens. When the layer thickness is 0.1 mm, samples printed in horizontal direction have the best mechanical performance. The vertical-direction-built parts generally have the worst tensile strength and impact resistance. Moreover, the layer surface quality of the products becomes worse with the increasing of layer thickness and printing speed. The influence of layer thickness on the roughness of FDM samples is still very significant. These researches are of great significance to explore the FDM molding mechanism and optimize processing parameters to meet the performance demands. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 00:000-000, 2018. FIG. 7. SEM images of ABS tensile specimens fractured surfaces (The number indicates the group number in the orthogonal experiments.).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of processing parameters in fused deposition modeling based on mechanical properties of acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene filament

Huang

Meng

et al. 2018

Polymer Engineering & Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Its popularity has grown from hobbyists to engineering professionals offering a remarkable control over designing novel architectures directly from computer aided design (CAD) software. [10,11] Contrary to traditional subtractive manufacturing where an object is carved from a bulk monolith, additive manufacturing allows complex structures to be printed layer-by-layer through a series of crosssectional slices. (Figure 1a).…”

Section: D Printing Methods-state Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of 3D Printing Methods and Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive manufacturing has revolutionized the building of materials, and 3D‐printing has become a useful tool for complex electrode assembly for batteries and supercapacitors. The field initially grew from extrusion‐based methods and quickly evolved to photopolymerization printing, while supercapacitor technologies less sensitive to solvents more often involved material jetting processes. The need to develop higher‐resolution multimaterial printers is borne out in the performance data of recent 3D printed electrochemical energy storage devices. Underpinning every part of a 3D‐printable battery are the printing method and the feed material. These influence material purity, printing fidelity, accuracy, complexity, and the ability to form conductive, ceramic, or solvent‐stable materials. The future of 3D‐printable batteries and electrochemical energy storage devices is reliant on materials and printing methods that are co‐operatively informed by device design. Herein, the material and method requirements in 3D‐printable batteries and supercapacitors are addressed and requirements for the future of the field are outlined by linking existing performance limitations to requirements for printable energy‐storage materials, casings, and direct printing of electrodes and electrolytes. A guide to materials and printing method choice best suited for alternative‐form‐factor energy‐storage devices to be designed and integrated into the devices they power is thus provided.

show abstract

“…These methods mainly use thermoplastic polymers, metal, or ceramic powders or resin to create 3D objects. AM of an object requires the following fundamental steps: (a) A 3D model is created or obtained and then converted to one of the default or novel file formats, (b) converted model is imported to an additive manufacturing system, and finally (c) the target object is produced layer by layer via common automation codes, mostly G codes …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Additive manufacturing and biomechanical validation of a patient‐specific diabetic insole

Peker

Aydin

Küçük

et al. 2020

Polymers for Advanced Techs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that lower extremity amputation (LEA) rate of per 1000 diabetic patients is 18.4 because of the complications that first appeared in the foot. A second amputation is also required for 9% to 17% of these patients within the same year although LEA may be preventable. Most of the diabetic foot conditions may be prevented and treated by a therapeutic footwear or a medical device such as an insole or an orthotic shoe. Traditional insole manufacturing is a laborious work that requires specific skills. Moreover, traditional approaches contain harmful material particles that may cause respiratory failure.Unfortunately, manufactured insoles may not be suitable for any mass-produced footwear in all cases. Therefore, patient requires to get insole-specific footwear. In this study, a diabetic insole was manufactured by means of a fused deposition modeling-(FDM) based system and a thermoplastic polymer. Biomechanical functionality was determined according to the applied polymer analysis on each produced sample and foam material. Subsequently, finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to target insole geometry to ensure the quality of the final medical product. Additive and traditional manufactured insoles are compared according to the cost and function. As a result, fabrication of an insole, based on the FDM method, was improved down to 8 h and 9 m. The weight of an insole prototype was 74.74 g, and the material cost was $3.44 while total cost of the traditional foam casting was determined as $35.37 and weight of the insole was 72.6 g for this study. Consequently, benefits of the applied method are evaluated. K E Y W O R D S additive manufacturing, biomechanical functionality, diabetes, finite element analysis, insole, patient-specific

show abstract

“Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing”, 2nd Edition

Cited by 153 publications

References 0 publications

Study of processing parameters in fused deposition modeling based on mechanical properties of acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene filament

Study of processing parameters in fused deposition modeling based on mechanical properties of acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene filament

Evolution of 3D Printing Methods and Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage

Additive manufacturing and biomechanical validation of a patient‐specific diabetic insole

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About