“…Moreover,w ea lso observed spontaneous activity regeneration after deactivation and incubation period of individual Pt nanocatalysts.A st he example shows in Figure 3c for the regeneration (*), this nanoparticle initially shows high catalytic activity with aT OF of 13.4 min À1 for reaction R2, after af ew periods of electrocatalytic HOR reaction (R1) through CV scans;t he TOF for R2 decreases hugely to 1.6 min À1 ;while with longer a R1 process,the TOF for R2 on this nanoparticle increases inversely to 12 min À1 step by step, indicating an effective activity regeneration of the Pt nanoparticle.Asfor the incubation period observed on individual Pt nanoparticles,a ss hown in Figure 3c (&), initially,t his particle shows very low activity for R2,asthe electrocatalytic HOR reaction (R1)p roceeds,t he activity for R2 increases gradually;after amaximum TOF of 14.5 min À1 ,its activity for R2 decreases inversely,w hich is an ormal deactivation process.S tatistically,a bout 2% of the observable Pt nanoparticles show such kind of activity regeneration, and 3% of the nanoparticles show incubation period. According to previous results, [15] the activity regeneration of nanocatalysts could be mainly attributed to the binding/unbinding of some chemical intermediates on nanoparticle surface.I nt his case, the poisonous intermediates with strong binding on Pt could be the byproducts from carbon oxidation or corrosion since the long-term R2 reaction only leads to anegligible effect on the performance of Pt/G for R1 ( Figure S12). [5b, 16] As for the incubation period observed here on individual particle,i t could be attributed to the gradual exposure or formation of fresh active sites on the particle surface.…”