Green Technologies for the Defluoridation of Water 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85768-0.00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption: Fundamental aspects and applications of adsorption for effluent treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
99
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results prove that the values of q t predicted by the GO model were the closest prediction to the experimentally obtained q t . 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results prove that the values of q t predicted by the GO model were the closest prediction to the experimentally obtained q t . 34 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 34 When 2 < ΔBIC < 6, the model with the lower BIC value has a prospective of being the best-fitted model. 34 When 6 < ΔBIC < 10, the model with the lower BIC value has a strong possibility of being the best-fitted model. 34 When ΔBIC ≥ 10, the model that presents the lower BIC value is certainly the best-fitted model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: , Figure S1: Tora Hellwan area where real contaminated samples were collected; Figure S2: DrTG data for MCH and after functionalization (MCH-ATA); Figure S3: Speciation diagrams for Cd(II) under the experimental conditions that selected for the study of pH effect (calculation using Visual Minteq [ 61 ]; Figure S4: Variation in the pH (from 1–5) for MCH and MCH-ATA; Figure S5: Plotting of pH eq vs. Log10D at 20 and 50 °C; Figure S6: Kinetic modeling for PSORE of MCH (a) and MCH-ATA(b); Figure S7: Freundlich and Temkin equations for Cd(II) sorption on MCH (a) and MCH-ATA(b) sorbents; Figure S8: EDX analysis of the MCH-ATA sorbent after 5 cycles of sorption desorption; Figure S9: Desorption kinetics of MCH and MCH-ATA using 0.2MHCl solution; Figure S10: Comparison of the MCL levels for drinking water and Livestock drinking water for MCH-ATA at different pH values; Table S1a: Reminder on equations used for modeling uptake kinetics [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]; Table S1b: Reminder on equations used for modeling sorption isotherms; Table S2: Assignments of the metal concentration comparing with the MCL values for drinking water and livestock drinking water [ 63 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]; Table S3: Textural properties of MCH and MCH-ATA; Table S4: Elemental analysis of MCH and MCH-ATA sorbents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%