2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances on the use of non-destructive techniques for mechanical characterization of stone masonry: GPR and sonic tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several new NDT and semi-NDT methods on the market, different in sophistication and purpose. As the focus of this research is mainly on masonry structures or combined masonry and concrete/timber structures, the most important NDT methods for existing masonry structures can be summarized: visual inspection [19], rebound hammer [20,21], measurement of reinforcement location [22], stress wave transmission [23], ultrasonic velocity testing [24], sonic velocity testing [25,26], surface penetrating radar [25,27], infrared thermography [28], flatjack tests [29,30], damage identification using impact vibrations [31], acoustic emission [32], etc. The basic advantages and disadvantages of the mentioned methods are described in Table 1.…”
Section: The Assessment Methods For Condition Inspection and Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several new NDT and semi-NDT methods on the market, different in sophistication and purpose. As the focus of this research is mainly on masonry structures or combined masonry and concrete/timber structures, the most important NDT methods for existing masonry structures can be summarized: visual inspection [19], rebound hammer [20,21], measurement of reinforcement location [22], stress wave transmission [23], ultrasonic velocity testing [24], sonic velocity testing [25,26], surface penetrating radar [25,27], infrared thermography [28], flatjack tests [29,30], damage identification using impact vibrations [31], acoustic emission [32], etc. The basic advantages and disadvantages of the mentioned methods are described in Table 1.…”
Section: The Assessment Methods For Condition Inspection and Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the accuracy of the numerical models to represent the structural behavior, a detailed investigation should be performed, i.e., verifying the geometry, assessing the mechanical properties of the materials, identifying zones where the deterioration or damage is present, and also checking the information in the design documents and drawings. For all these reasons, the use of nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques has become more common in the condition assessment of existing structures, as it enables to gather data with minimum damage to the structure in study [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%