2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part I: Review of present knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
234
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
9
234
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct measurements of dust concentrations are needed as well as optical depths, to allow both modeled concentrations and parametrized radiative properties to be assessed. Improved understanding and parametrizations of wet and dry deposition processes are also required (Jung and Shao, 2006;Petroff et al, 2008). The representation of radiative properties is another area where development would be useful.…”
Section: Summary and Status Of Dust In Earth System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements of dust concentrations are needed as well as optical depths, to allow both modeled concentrations and parametrized radiative properties to be assessed. Improved understanding and parametrizations of wet and dry deposition processes are also required (Jung and Shao, 2006;Petroff et al, 2008). The representation of radiative properties is another area where development would be useful.…”
Section: Summary and Status Of Dust In Earth System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the vegetation structure and activity has an impact on atmospheric chemistry through deposition of pollutants and emissions of volatile organic compounds (Guenther et al, 2006;Lathiere et al, 2006;Petroff et al, 2008). Hence, there is a strong coupling between O 3 and vegetation: the first one impacts plant productivity that, in turn, can affect the atmospheric O 3 concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the impact of atmospheric pollutants on plant productivity has been already evaluated (e.g. Ren et al, 2007), as well as the deposition of pollutants on the canopy (Petroff et al, 2008) and the role of vegetation in BVOC emissions (e.g. Guenther et al, 2006;Lathiere et al, 2006), the vegetation-atmosphere feedbacks are still under investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretically predicted deposition rate is lowest for particle sizes between 100 nm and 2 µm, with several orders of magnitude difference between different models (cf. Petroff et al, 2008). In a review of particle atmosphere-surface exchange, Pryor et al (2008b) conclude that: few studies have sought to quantify the dependence of flux on particle size; observations over forests do not support the theoretical minimum depositions rate manifest in models; and that more research is required to determine if dry deposition of aerosols is an important removal mechanism for ultrafine particles, especially over surfaces with high roughness, such as forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%