The measurement of transport efficiency (e") by direct aerosol collection Is found to be capable of superior accuracy and precision to Indirect methods. A comparison of different direct methods, using cascade Impactor, filter, and silica gel trap collection with Indirect methods, using analyte waste collection, Is made. Cascade Impactor collection Is preferred for an atomic absorption nebulizer/spray chamber system, whereas either cascade Impactor or filter collection procedures give comparable data for an Inductively coupled plasma/spray chamber combination. Indirect methods are shown to have poor precision and lead frequently to high en values. The transport efficiency for a typical atomic absorption nebulizer/spray chamber/burner head combination Is found to be 6.6 ± 0.3 % and for a typical Inductively coupled plasma nebulizer/spray chamber/torch combination to be 1.1 ± 0.1%.