1982
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91142-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afferent connections of the ectostriatum and visual wulst in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould) — an HRP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the ectostriatal core, no subdivision or lamination can be detected anatomically. However, several studies (Cohen and Karten 1974;Nixdorf and Bischof 1982) have demonstrated that the nucleus rotundus projects topographically into the ectostriatum, suggesting that there is at least a certain degree of topographical order in this area. From the distribution of macroscopic sinks and sources demonstrated above, it is likely that the ectostriatum is ordered functionally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the ectostriatal core, no subdivision or lamination can be detected anatomically. However, several studies (Cohen and Karten 1974;Nixdorf and Bischof 1982) have demonstrated that the nucleus rotundus projects topographically into the ectostriatum, suggesting that there is at least a certain degree of topographical order in this area. From the distribution of macroscopic sinks and sources demonstrated above, it is likely that the ectostriatum is ordered functionally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of the presence of subfields, the term Field L has come to have two different uses in the literature, one in which it refers to L2 alone and one in which it refers to L1-3. Similar problems arise with respect to the ectostriatum, because in some studies the core and shell are together referred to as the ectostriatum, whereas in others only the thalamorecipient core is called the ectostriatum (Karten and Revzin, 1966;Karten and Hodos, 1970;Benowitz and Karten, 1976;Nixdorf and Bischof, 1982;Husband and Shimizu, 1999). Because the structure that has been known as the nucleus basalis also shows a core and shell organization, a similar problem exists for it ( Fig.…”
Section: Rationale For Individual Changes: the Neostriatummentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fiber-rich zone interposed between the entopallium and the lateral striatum primarily contains axons that had coursed from the nucleus rotundus of the thalamus to the telencephalon via the lateral forebrain bundle (or fasciculus prosencephali lateralis), in their passage to their termination in the structure that we recommend now be called the entopallium (Karten and Hodos, 1970;Nixdorf and Bischof, 1982). This fiber-rich zone has been termed the tractus thalamostriaticus (TTS).…”
Section: Lamina Frontalis Superior (Lfs) 3 Lamina Frontalis Superior mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nRT-Ec projection is topographic: the caudal and rostral Ec receive input from subnuclei in the caudal and rostral nRT, respectively (Benowitz and Karten, 1976;Nixdorf and Bischof, 1982). The physiological organization of nRT (see above) (Wang et al, 1993) suggests that the caudal Ec should be important for visual motion processing, whereas the rostral Ec should be important for spatial-pattern vision and color.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%