2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000717)423:1<132::aid-cne11>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Afferent innervation of outer and inner hair cells is normal in neonatally de-efferented cats

Abstract: It has been hypothesized that normal pruning of exuberant branching of afferent neurons in the developing cochlea is caused by the arrival of the olivocochlear efferent neurons and the resulting competition for synaptic sites on hair cells. This hypothesis was supported by a report that afferent innervation density on mature outer hair cells (OHCs) is elevated in animals deefferented at birth, before the olivocochlear system reaches the outer hair cell area (Pujol and Carlier [1982] Dev. Brain Res. 3:151-154).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This change cannot be accounted for based on the weight of the animals because weight did not differ significantly between control and α9KO mice (P50 control: 21.5 ± 0.8 g, P50 α9KO: 21.8 ± 0.8 g; p = 0.80, Student's t- test). In addition, cochlear compound action potential (CAP) threshold sensitivity is unchanged in α9KO mice (Vetter et al, 1999; He et al, 2004), and chronic de-efferentation does not affect afferent innervation of either IHCs or OHCs (Liberman et al, 2000). Thus, it is unlikely that changes in the cochlea or in auditory nerve activity are responsible for the reduced ASR amplitudes in α9KO mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change cannot be accounted for based on the weight of the animals because weight did not differ significantly between control and α9KO mice (P50 control: 21.5 ± 0.8 g, P50 α9KO: 21.8 ± 0.8 g; p = 0.80, Student's t- test). In addition, cochlear compound action potential (CAP) threshold sensitivity is unchanged in α9KO mice (Vetter et al, 1999; He et al, 2004), and chronic de-efferentation does not affect afferent innervation of either IHCs or OHCs (Liberman et al, 2000). Thus, it is unlikely that changes in the cochlea or in auditory nerve activity are responsible for the reduced ASR amplitudes in α9KO mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severing the efferent supply of newborn cats altered afferent response properties (Walsh et al, 1998) but not cochlear afferent innervation, (Liberman et al, 2000) although previous efforts did show elevated afferent innervation to OHCs (Pujol and Carlier, 1982). While potentially revealing, surgical ablation presents substantial experimental challenges.…”
Section: Effect Of Altering Moc Efferent Function or Innervationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, we have previously described that ChAT immunolabelling is absent under the IHCs and OHCs in the mid-turn mouse cochlea until P3 [12], and no significant TMRD labelling of the efferent fibres occurred until P6, by which time the transient type I afferent synapses were retracting. Moreover, efferent terminals are not required for the normal development of cochlear afferent innervation [51]. Therefore the transient ribbon synapses formed on OHCs between P0 and P3 are unlikely to reflect the formation of efferent synapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%