2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity measurement of ligands in Perilla frutescens extract towards α-glucosidase using affinity-based ultrafiltration-high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , after affinity ultrafiltration, the chromatographic information obtained by LC/MS was used to determine the binding of a total of nine compounds to MAO‐B. The binding strength of each compound to MAO‐B was calculated as: Binding degree (%)=()()A1A2/A×100%. where A is the peak area of the sample peak, A 1 is the compound peak area in the presence of MAO‐B, and A 2 is the compound peak area of a sample assayed without MAO‐B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Figure , after affinity ultrafiltration, the chromatographic information obtained by LC/MS was used to determine the binding of a total of nine compounds to MAO‐B. The binding strength of each compound to MAO‐B was calculated as: Binding degree (%)=()()A1A2/A×100%. where A is the peak area of the sample peak, A 1 is the compound peak area in the presence of MAO‐B, and A 2 is the compound peak area of a sample assayed without MAO‐B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affinity ultrafiltration liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (AUF‐LC/MS n ) is a rapid separation and purification technology used to screen natural product extracts for compounds with the desired biological activities . Thus, AUF‐LC/MS n has become a pharmacological profiling tool widely used to screen for target protein ligands in complex systems such as TCM preparations or compound libraries . Compared with other screening techniques, this method requires minimal sample preparation, has a low protein consumption, is less time‐consuming, has a high throughput, and determines the binding strength of each ligand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences between the procedures derive from the type of eluents selected and whether they run in isocratic or gradient elution [ 10 ]. The low UV absorption provided by the saturated skeleton of pentacyclic triterpenes could underlay the aforementioned limited [ 55 , 56 ]. To overcome these shortcomings, liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (LC–MS) has become a powerful hyphenated technique that enables the separation, unambiguous detection and characterization of bioactive compounds in complex samples.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Techniques For Oamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting the bioactive compounds in the extract prior to separation and separating them in a target-guided manner can improve the separation efficiency and increase the “hit”. In particular, the antioxidants and enzyme inhibitors in extracts can be screened using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical reaction-based DPPH-high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [ 27 , 28 ] and enzyme–ligand binding affinity-based ultrafiltration-HPLC [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], respectively. Moreover, as a versatile separation chromatography based on a continuous liquid–liquid partition, high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) with advantages of support matrix-free, no irreversible adsorption, low risk of sample denaturation, and high sample loading capacity has immense potential in separating natural products [ 32 , 33 ], and it is suitable to couple offline DPPH- and ultrafiltration-HPLC in order to achieve efficient screening and separation of bioactive compounds from natural product extracts [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%