2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1144-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affordances and the normativity of emotions

Abstract: The normativity of emotions is a widely discussed phenomenon. So far embodied accounts have not paid sufficient attention to the various aspects of the normativity of emotions. In this paper it shall be pointed out that embodied accounts are constrained in the way they can account for the normativity of emotions due to their commitments to naturalism, externalism, and anti-vehicle-internalism. One way to account for the normativity of emotions within a naturalist framework is to describe the intentional object… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But we perceive environments as affording more than just practical actions (e.g., reaching for and grasping a beer bottle or nuts in a bowl). What is often overlooked in these debates is that we also perceive affective affordances (Hufendiek 2016).…”
Section: Constructing Affordance Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we perceive environments as affording more than just practical actions (e.g., reaching for and grasping a beer bottle or nuts in a bowl). What is often overlooked in these debates is that we also perceive affective affordances (Hufendiek 2016).…”
Section: Constructing Affordance Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The felt property of salience within the perceptual world occurs via affective goads that dynamically covary with homeokinetic and exogenous needs, leading to adaptive action patterns and information-seeking behaviors. Affect motivates perception as the internal context that locks onto relevant invariant aspects of the environment to shape subpersonal processes, which then serve the intentional aspects of act-planning (S. Gallagher, 2009;Hufendiek, 2017;Pacherie, 2011). The unity of perception-action systems qua affordances are depicted as learned vehicles of imperative informational transfer between the creature and the learned context of the social and spatial environment (Heft, 2007;Hutto & Myin, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only does the world practically constrain and allow certain styles of expressive action, it also affords different forms of interactive possibilities. We do not perceive our environments as neutral but as permeated with certain affordances, solicitations for particular actions or affective possibilities (Gibson 1986;Valenti & Gold 1991;Kiverstein 2015;Hufendiek 2016;Krueger & Colombetti 2018). By affording various action, social, and affective possibilities, the environment can solicit and drive particular forms of interaction.…”
Section: Materials Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%