2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0130.2010.00641.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Against the Wall: Anarchist Mobilization in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes being a practice-based (rather than ideologically based) loosely formed group of activists organized in a non-hierarchical alliance committed to direct action. 6 Moreover, the West Bank activity of AAtW participants is based on the principles of solidarity and hence is only conducted when invited to do so by Palestinians to join local initiatives (see AAtW 2004;Blecher 2006;Gordon 2007Gordon , 2010Gordon and Grietzer 2013;Nagler et al 2006;Pallister-Wilkins 2009).…”
Section: Anarchists Against the Wall: A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This includes being a practice-based (rather than ideologically based) loosely formed group of activists organized in a non-hierarchical alliance committed to direct action. 6 Moreover, the West Bank activity of AAtW participants is based on the principles of solidarity and hence is only conducted when invited to do so by Palestinians to join local initiatives (see AAtW 2004;Blecher 2006;Gordon 2007Gordon , 2010Gordon and Grietzer 2013;Nagler et al 2006;Pallister-Wilkins 2009).…”
Section: Anarchists Against the Wall: A Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The term direct action here follows Benjamin Franks' (2003) articulation as a form of political intervention which is prefigurative (an accordance between means and ends), non-representative (the agents are objecting to their own direct oppression on behalf of no one but themselves, and the actions themselves are configured as non-symbolic), and non-consequentialist (acts cannot be justified as a means to an end), which draws its meaning from the identity of the partaking agents and of the particular and local configuration of the oppressing forces they aim to oppose. 7 It is important to note that this form of solidarity should be distinguished from the politics of Jewish-Palestinian dialogue and co-existence (Gordon 2010;Pallister-Wilkins 2009). 8 Judging the validity of this claim is beyond our scope here.…”
Section: Conclusion: On Passingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ES faces the wall, takes a pole vault and then soars over it: this is a political statement, but is also slightly comical and suggests the malleability and pointlessness of enforced barriers. The physical wall becomes obsolete, a symbol and reality of separation (Usher 2006), but also one that can and should be transgressed and can become linked to Palestinian agency (Shalhoub‐Kevorkian 2006) and activism (Gordon 2010; Pallister‐Wilkins 2009). Such third space creates potentially enabling moments that allow alterative imaginings that are both idealistic but at the same time grounded in material circumstances that require critical attention.…”
Section: Performing Hopeful Space In Palestine‐israel Through Film?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uri Gordon writes: "The past ten years have seen a full-blown revival of a global anarchist movement, possessing a coherent core political practice, on a scale and scope of activity unseen since the 1930s" (Gordon, 2010, 414; see also Gordon, 2007;Dixon, 2012). Giorel Guran agrees that "postideological anarchism informs the impulse, culture and organization of oppositional politics today" (2006,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%