2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related differences in memory-encoding fMRI responses after accounting for decline in vascular reactivity

Abstract: BOLD fMRI has provided a wealth of information about the aging brain. A common finding is that posterior regions of the brain manifest an age-related decrease in activation while the anterior regions show an age-related increase. Several neurocognitive models have been proposed to interpret these findings. However, one issue that has not been sufficiently considered to date is that the BOLD signal is based on vascular responses secondary to neural activity. Thus the above findings could be in part due to a vas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
83
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our conclusion that age has little impact on retrieval-related neural activity rests on the assumption that the transfer function mediating between neural activity and the fMRI BOLD signal is age-invariant. There is evidence however that cerebro-vascular reactivity (CVR) – an important non-neural determinant of BOLD signal magnitude – declines with age (e.g., Lu et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2013). Therefore it will be important to see whether the present findings require qualification in light of further research in which retrieval-related BOLD activity is corrected for individual differences in CVR (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our conclusion that age has little impact on retrieval-related neural activity rests on the assumption that the transfer function mediating between neural activity and the fMRI BOLD signal is age-invariant. There is evidence however that cerebro-vascular reactivity (CVR) – an important non-neural determinant of BOLD signal magnitude – declines with age (e.g., Lu et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2013). Therefore it will be important to see whether the present findings require qualification in light of further research in which retrieval-related BOLD activity is corrected for individual differences in CVR (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CVR mapping has been shown to provide valuable information in the evaluation of various cerebrovascular conditions, including arterial stenosis (Donahue et al, 2013; Gupta et al, 2012; Mandell et al, 2008; Mikulis et al, 2005), stroke (Geranmayeh et al, 2015), small vessel disease (Greenberg, 2006), brain tumors (Zaca et al, 2014), traumatic brain injury (Chan et al, 2015; Kenney et al, 2016), substance abuse (Han et al, 2008), and normal aging (Gauthier et al, 2013; Lu et al, 2011). CVR also has important utility in normalizing blood-oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal to differentiate neuronal from vascular alternations in brain function (Liu et al, 2013a; Liu et al, 2013b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using arterial-spin-labeling MRI) due to its higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This CVR mapping method has been successfully applied in a number of research studies in healthy and chronic disease patients (Donahue et al, 2013; Donahue et al, 2014; Han et al, 2008; Liu et al, 2013b; Lu et al, 2011; Mandell et al, 2008; Marshall et al, 2014; Mikulis et al, 2005; Thomas et al, 2013). However, the inherent need of gas inhalation and the associated apparatus setup requires additional time and expertise for handling and monitoring, which may limit the applications of this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include the use of hypercapnia (i.e., the establishment of a baseline BOLD signal through breath-holding), CO2 inhalation, or using resting state activity as a baseline (Handwerker et al 2007;Kannurpatti et al 2010aKannurpatti et al , 2010b. However, the evidence to date for the need to control for such group differences has been inconclusive, as minimal or inconsistent age differences have been found in the brain response to breath-holding (Handwerker et al 2007), or in vascular reactivity (Kannurpatti et al 2010a(Kannurpatti et al , 2010bLiu et al 2013). Because of such concerns, we attempted to remove all "unwanted" sources of noise in our data by means of rigorous denoising using ICA , so it is unlikely that the age differences we observed were due solely to such influences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%